Author Topic: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?  (Read 646 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 128997
  • Reputation: -49
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2019, 04:06:16 AM »
EPSTEIN’S STRANGE PAINTING

Quote from: Guido
According to the the New York Post a painting dubbed “Parsing Bill” by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid hung on the wall of Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million townhouse. It was of the former president in the famous dress worn by Monica Lewinsky. Until now Guido believed that Epstein did kill himself in jail, given he knew what lay ahead for him. Now however, well, Clinton had motive for this alone… never mind the other rumours…





 eeek:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36116
  • Reputation: 5
  • I mostly despair
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2019, 09:14:56 AM »
EPSTEIN’S STRANGE PAINTING

Quote from: Guido
According to the the New York Post a painting dubbed “Parsing Bill” by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid hung on the wall of Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million townhouse. It was of the former president in the famous dress worn by Monica Lewinsky. Until now Guido believed that Epstein did kill himself in jail, given he knew what lay ahead for him. Now however, well, Clinton had motive for this alone… never mind the other rumours…





 eeek:
Clinton in a dress?
Come off it.  noooo:
I mostly despair

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 40999
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2019, 09:15:52 AM »
EPSTEIN’S STRANGE PAINTING

Quote from: Guido
According to the the New York Post a painting dubbed “Parsing Bill” by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid hung on the wall of Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million townhouse. It was of the former president in the famous dress worn by Monica Lewinsky. Until now Guido believed that Epstein did kill himself in jail, given he knew what lay ahead for him. Now however, well, Clinton had motive for this alone… never mind the other rumours…





 eeek:
Clinton in a dress?
Come off it.  noooo:
happy001
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 128997
  • Reputation: -49
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2019, 11:11:44 AM »
EPSTEIN’S STRANGE PAINTING

Quote from: Guido
According to the the New York Post a painting dubbed “Parsing Bill” by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid hung on the wall of Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million townhouse. It was of the former president in the famous dress worn by Monica Lewinsky. Until now Guido believed that Epstein did kill himself in jail, given he knew what lay ahead for him. Now however, well, Clinton had motive for this alone… never mind the other rumours…





 eeek:
Clinton in a dress?
Come off it.  noooo:

 drumroll:

happy002
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Just One More

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 22860
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #19 on: August 16, 2019, 07:48:04 PM »
EPSTEIN’S STRANGE PAINTING

Quote from: Guido
According to the the New York Post a painting dubbed “Parsing Bill” by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid hung on the wall of Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million townhouse. It was of the former president in the famous dress worn by Monica Lewinsky. Until now Guido believed that Epstein did kill himself in jail, given he knew what lay ahead for him. Now however, well, Clinton had motive for this alone… never mind the other rumours…





 eeek:
Clinton in a dress?
Come off it.  noooo:

 drumroll:

happy002

 drumroll:  drumroll:

happy002 happy002
LiFe - It's an "F" in lie

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 128997
  • Reputation: -49
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2019, 05:13:14 AM »


Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 40999
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2019, 08:55:52 AM »
 ::)

Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 25268
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2019, 06:01:56 AM »
So he was taken off suicide watch, left unmonitored by the prison staff including one person who wasn't qualified to be there, had suspicious broken bones in his neck and now it emerges that the 2 cameras outside his cell were mysteriously not working so there is no footage....


You are right, clearly suicide, nothing suspect at all  rubschin:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras/fbi-studies-two-broken-cameras-outside-cell-where-epstein-died-source-idUKKCN1VI2NA
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 128997
  • Reputation: -49
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2019, 06:55:44 AM »
So he was taken off suicide watch, left unmonitored by the prison staff including one person who wasn't qualified to be there, had suspicious broken bones in his neck and now it emerges that the 2 cameras outside his cell were mysteriously not working so there is no footage....


You are right, clearly suicide, nothing suspect at all  rubschin:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras/fbi-studies-two-broken-cameras-outside-cell-where-epstein-died-source-idUKKCN1VI2NA

 noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 40999
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2019, 08:08:22 AM »
So he was taken off suicide watch, left unmonitored by the prison staff including one person who wasn't qualified to be there, had suspicious broken bones in his neck and now it emerges that the 2 cameras outside his cell were mysteriously not working so there is no footage....


You are right, clearly suicide, nothing suspect at all  rubschin:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras/fbi-studies-two-broken-cameras-outside-cell-where-epstein-died-source-idUKKCN1VI2NA
Not what the article is saying and they like others are just rehashing the Washington Post article of a few days back.  Only one camera had unusable video, the other(s) apparently do have
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 25268
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Criminal negligence or something more sinister?
« Reply #25 on: November 07, 2019, 08:52:19 AM »
The latest revelation from Project Veritas indicating a media cover up means things could be about to get interesting...

https://youtu.be/3lfwkTsJGYA

Given that Amy Robach has worked at ABC for over 7 years now and has been a news anchor for nearly 5 combined with the potential perceived fallout from the revelations at the time I'm inclined to believe this is genuine.
Praise Z0rg!