Disgusterous

Author Topic: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn  (Read 6732 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154933
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2008, 04:03:44 PM »
And now this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7331107.stm

Beware of strangers my arse!
I Don’t know why but there is something doubly awful about the thought of women being involved in such a thing…  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2008, 04:16:29 PM »
OK Let us twist the scenario ~ suppose that the child was considered by her Mother, Auntie, Grannie to be at risk from the Step Father or that the Mother, perhaps knowing of the Step Father's liking for kiddie porn, thought that it was time to hoof him out and has discussed the how and why of this with her rellies .... so they hatch a plot to frighten him by spiriting her away and hiding her with an Uncle where they feel she will be safe and they can pop in and out to make sure all is well. Then they report her missing (it took them some time to do this remember) and sit back and let the hue and cry put the skids under the Step Father who they wanted to "get".
So far there has been no evidence or even suggestion that she has been harmed or molested ~ in fact those neighbours that were interviewed after having seen her being taken away by a police officer from the flat where she was "found" all said she looked happy and relaxed about the whole thing ..... hardly the way one would expect a child who had been in the hands of a peado for several weeks to be described.
There is so much in this and the more that comes out the less certain I am that it is/was a simple abduction for sexual purposes.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #32 on: April 05, 2008, 03:06:10 PM »
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154933
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2008, 03:31:25 PM »
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2008, 03:48:46 PM »
And charge the cost of the bullets to whatever estate they may have.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109648
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #35 on: April 05, 2008, 03:51:07 PM »
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:

Judging by the size of most of the family they weould need a fleet of JCBS noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154933
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2008, 04:18:03 PM »
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:

Judging by the size of most of the family they weould need a fleet of JCBS noooo:
noooo:
...using only their bare fingers...
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109648
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #37 on: April 07, 2008, 07:28:34 AM »
So now the mother has been arrested.

I heard on the news that she is 32!

I would have put her nearer 50 by the look of her noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #38 on: April 07, 2008, 07:43:08 AM »
So now the mother has been arrested.

I heard on the news that she is 32!

I would have put her nearer 50 by the look of her noooo:

Staggerin' isn't it? Must only be the brother/sister/whoever, there's that many of them, left to be questioned now.

I know you shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, but this one had "The encyclopedia of Hammer House of Horrors' written all over it the first time I clapped eyes on that mother and her 'flock'.....32 my arse!  happy001

Isn't that the number of different fathers her kids have got? rubschin:

« Last Edit: April 07, 2008, 07:47:35 AM by GROWLER »

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109648
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #39 on: April 07, 2008, 07:47:05 AM »
I just tried to post a pic of the mother. It crashed my computer! eeek:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 22115
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #40 on: April 07, 2008, 07:53:45 AM »
Here you go:




32...   eeek:

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #41 on: April 07, 2008, 07:54:47 AM »
Here you go:




32...   eeek:



Corrrrr! cloud9:












Appointment at specsavers @11....meow!

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #42 on: April 07, 2008, 08:36:46 AM »
Blimey big G ~ I know you're after a dog but there are limits mate.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

chuntering again

  • Guest
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #43 on: April 07, 2008, 12:50:25 PM »
I agree with Snoopy. Repellent as the Matthews are, they are entitled to due process of the law and not to be tried in absentia by the gutter press. That said, it's a riveting soap opera and I can't wait to read the next "revelation".

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 22115
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
« Reply #44 on: April 07, 2008, 12:55:30 PM »
The full story will be very interesting, although I'm losing track of who's who.

A family tree would useful.  eeek: