Author Topic: Enforced intamacy  (Read 3123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Enforced intimacy
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2007, 12:00:29 PM »
I ought to have complained to the polioce, but I was youngish and so shocked I never did anything about it!!

Erm...I have absolutely no idea what to say to that  eeek:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109664
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2007, 12:01:11 PM »
Nor me!

It was a long time ago...........................................................................
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Enforced intimacy
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2007, 08:01:58 PM »
I ought to have complained to the polioce, but I was youngish and so shocked I never did anything about it!!

So you should have.

Y-Front reversal was a hanging offence until 1968.
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109664
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2007, 08:41:59 PM »
 confused:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154981
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #19 on: December 05, 2007, 05:52:02 AM »
I once came round from a dental anaesthetic (gas) to find the dentist tucking my shirt into my trousers. When I go t home I found my underpants were on back to front. eeek:

Hammersmith, 1977
Hold on...  rubschin:

How long was the queue in the waiting room when you went out?  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #20 on: December 05, 2007, 09:16:44 AM »
The plot thickens...there is a lot more to this story methinks

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154981
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2007, 09:20:23 AM »
The plot thickens...there is a lot more to this story methinks
Indeed...  rubschin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2007, 09:51:21 AM »
The plot thickens...there is a lot more to this story methinks

Perhaps the tooth had a veeeeery deep root?
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109664
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2007, 09:52:00 AM »
I cannot enlighten you further. The whole point is that whatever happened happened while I was unconscious!
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154981
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2007, 09:52:29 AM »
I cannot enlighten you further. The whole point is that whatever happened happened while I was unconscious!
So you say...  whistle:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #25 on: December 05, 2007, 09:54:17 AM »
I cannot enlighten you further. The whole point is that whatever happened happened while I was unconscious!

Were the pants inside-out as well?

That would give an important clue.
I mostly despair

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #26 on: December 05, 2007, 09:56:40 AM »
You may, of course, have put your own y fronts on back to front that morning ~ my boys frequently manage this trick and seem totally unaware of it. It is hard to imagine how a dentist would have managed the feat of removing both outer and underwear and then replacing the garments, albeit back to front, from someone of your size without assistance whilst the removee was unconscious.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #27 on: December 05, 2007, 12:06:33 PM »
And why did he need to remove them entirely eh? Surely sliding them down around the ankles might have been sufficient eh Holmes?
« Last Edit: December 05, 2007, 12:11:19 PM by grumpyoldsoldier »

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 154981
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #28 on: December 05, 2007, 12:07:38 PM »
And why did he need to removethe entirely eh? Surely sliding them down around the ankles might have been sufficient eh Holmes?
Indeed... good point GOS... the plot thickens...  rubschin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109664
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Enforced intamacy
« Reply #29 on: December 05, 2007, 12:08:00 PM »
 noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile