You mean a parliament that has decided the referendum result wasn't what they wanted and have been hell for leather in their attempts to stop Brexit despite the hypocrisy of knowing that despite the referendum using the exact same procedures and protocols as the election that voted them in, in most, if not all cases, the percentage majority who voted to leave is greater than the percentage of those who did not vote them into individual office. An opposition leader who's only reason for blocking legitimate elections is that he knows he has royally fucked over his party's heartland and would get hammered at the polls. A speaker who has ignored the core tenant of his role to be an impartial voice. A remain core who have gone out of their way to weaken the bargaining position of the UK just for the chance of being able to overturn a democratic decision.
No, a parliament that's unhappy the Brexit plan is very far from what they were promised by that liar Bojo so won't let him run with his pyrrhic plan or allow him to force it on the country by getting permission for an election using a false promise it'd be October 14th
You do know how to spot when Boris is lying don't you?
Are you trying to say that Boris is the only dishonest politician in Westminster? How about Corbyn's 'we will abide by the results of the referendum' speech. The single biggest handicap that the negotiations had was a parliament that was fighting itself instead of working together to come up with the best deal for the country. And let's he honest about Labour here, most of the northern constituencies who voted to leave had watched their labour MP fight for the remain side in total contempt for those who had elected them. That is why the coward is terrified of having an election before the end of October. Plus the EU knows just how weak it is economically at the moment and that a no deal brexit would likely have been the start of the collapse as they would have not only lost one of their primary contributors but also seen Germany's economy go into recession not to mention that France is already ignoring their deficit. That's why there have been a noticeable number of European politicians demanding that the EU comes up with a deal that is fair to the UK. No deal was the ultimate bargaining tool before a large number of MP's put the EU before the UK.
As for MP's trying to stop something being forced on the country, let's look at the organisation that they are fighting to remain a part of.
The French had a referendum on the EU constitution where they voted overwhelmingly against. It was later repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty and Sarkosy signed it into law without giving the electorate a say in the matter.
The Irish referendum on the same treaty had to be repeated until the Irish said yes, and that wasn't the first time that had happened.
The Irish referendum on the treaty of Nice was also repeated until they said yes.
While they did an appalling job of it the democratically elected government of Greece was forced to stand down and be replaced by eurocrats before aid money was made available an action that could easily be described as an economic coup. And I'm sure that BM and co can give a good description of the economic effects of that new leadership on the area.
If you are going to condemn something being forced on a country then you do it equally across the board. Unless that is, you want a cushy job in the commission once you have left office.
