Disgusterous

Author Topic: F*****g nutters  (Read 880 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Demeanour

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36017
  • Reputation: 2
F*****g nutters
« on: September 29, 2017, 01:05:24 PM »
A complaint  against the Council has been passed onto me today to respond ( as we have to ) when our 'service users' go through the formal channels of making a complaint.

There are at least 60 pages of absolute nutteriness.

She is barking.

She is seeking Circa £2 billion ( plus interest apparently to be paid on time and back dated from 1986) for damages

I will list a few of her claims for your absolute entertainment as you don't officially have to respond . This should cheer up your Friday !!!


- Damages sought for hijacking her life and making sure everything was stolen including her Monet inheritance
- Damages for preventing her from collecting £20 million inheritance from her Royal Godparents 20 years ago 
- Damages for preventing her from doing her art  ( seeking £200 million for that !!)
- Damages from the English Army and Navy for doing brutal and illegal experience on her brain - an odious form of rape on her body cells
- Damages from the salvation Army for her illegal kidnapping and experimenation on her body
- Damages from a Mr Anthony Blair and his jewish wife Booth-Blair for having her stomach stuffed with a modem
- Damages from the Jewish Windsors , all the Windsors and their goldsmiths
-Damages from the Council for forcing internal mobile crystals and amnomia beads into her so as to force her to hear the French language ( £600 million for that one !!!)
- Damages for the pack of lies about the existence of Sigmund Freud  who was actually a brother of Karl Marx
- Damages from the utility company as using her electric key card is causing brusies to her face and casuing her muscles to curl
- Damages against The Macmillan Trust ( installed by the mad Jewish slut Robert Maxwell . That advertises very large women with leering faces telling you they'll be there for you when you have cancer . These terror units actually gives you cancer she claims.
- Damages against the health service which is also a terror unit. She suggests that the cash be diverted from them and given to road sweepers who do more to keep her free form infection

She has made some suggestions that she wants the Local Authority to implement immediately

- Install a giant piggy bank in Trafalgar square so that the public can put spare cash in this and this can then be used for fireworks
- She has also requested an application for a licnce to grow sunflowers

 Banghead cussing: Banghead cussing: Banghead cussing:


Skubber

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: F*****g nutters
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2017, 01:23:15 PM »
She probably has a point about the Salvation Army, apart from that, total nutter.  noooo:
I mostly despair

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 155317
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: F*****g nutters
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2017, 02:36:02 PM »
You must surely have enough evidence to get her sectioned...?  eveilgrin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Miss Demeanour

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36017
  • Reputation: 2
Re: F*****g nutters
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2017, 03:44:03 PM »
What really pisses me off is that we have to respond to her  Banghead
Skubber

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109807
  • Reputation: -115
Re: F*****g nutters
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2017, 05:42:49 PM »
WHat address do I send my claim to?
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Online Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 65294
  • Reputation: -4
Re: F*****g nutters
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2017, 05:58:05 PM »
What really pisses me off is that we have to respond to her  Banghead
Easy Peasy

Just write:  "We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram."


Explanation:  http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html
Well, whatever, nevermind