Author Topic: Excruciating indeed (Read 1268 times)

Pastis · « **on:** June 27, 2012, 05:33:49 PM »

Nick · « **Reply #1 on:** June 27, 2012, 05:40:40 PM »

Saw that. Bet she had a cold shower afterwards

Barman · « **Reply #2 on:** June 27, 2012, 05:55:46 PM »

What a farce...

Uncle Mort · « **Reply #3 on:** June 27, 2012, 07:41:53 PM »

I thought she did quite well, defending a policy move she probably didn't agree with against Paxman the great naysayer.

Nick · « **Reply #4 on:** June 27, 2012, 07:54:59 PM »

Yes, but only by repeating the mantra

Tell the truth FFS, why do they treat us as though we are idiots?????

Pastis · « **Reply #5 on:** June 27, 2012, 07:56:15 PM »

But why wasn't Osborne there to defend yet another switcheroo? He's only confirming the nick of "Submarine" each time he ducks ...

Uncle Mort · « **Reply #6 on:** June 27, 2012, 07:58:33 PM »

Because Osbourne is not an idiot which, to answer Nick, 90% of us are.

Nick · « **Reply #7 on:** June 27, 2012, 07:59:45 PM »

Well it's patronising

Uncle Mort · « **Reply #8 on:** June 27, 2012, 08:10:12 PM »

90% probably don't feel patronised.

Nick · « **Reply #9 on:** June 27, 2012, 08:12:37 PM »

I disagree. A child could see her prevaricating

Show it to your two. They would laff!"!

Uncle Mort · « **Reply #10 on:** June 27, 2012, 08:38:00 PM »

I'm sure they would but most of the GBP* can't spell prevaricate let alone recognise it.

* Great British Public

« **Reply #11 on:** July 01, 2012, 08:10:08 AM »

I thought she did quite well, defending a policy move she probably didn't agree with against Paxman the great naysayer.

I saw it too and it was excruciating, not only did she probably disagree, she probably didn't know about it.

The Virtual Pub