The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => The Commons => Topic started by: Nick on April 12, 2011, 07:59:29 PM

Title: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on April 12, 2011, 07:59:29 PM
OK, what is the VP view? I am agin it because so many luvvies are in favour, but I can see some advantages.

HELP
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Pastis on April 12, 2011, 08:03:09 PM
I can see some advantages so I'm for it. It'll make bugger all difference here though  Shrugs:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 12, 2011, 08:28:19 PM
No way .... the only countriea that use it are basket cases.... Anywhooo it ain't the British Way. Winner is the first past the post. No prizes for losers.
It reminds me of NuLabours schools policies. Can't have a sports day in case there are losers.
Utter rubbish.
If you make a good enough case then you get in, if you cannot convince enough people to vote for you then you don't deserve a place.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on April 12, 2011, 08:30:52 PM
Does it make a blind bit of difference when you look at the choices ......it's like choosing which fish to eat  noooo:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 12, 2011, 08:32:27 PM
Does it make a blind bit of difference when you look at the choices ......it's like choosing which fish to eat  noooo:

I eat salmon but I would never vote for the slippery bugger
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Pastis on April 12, 2011, 08:41:50 PM
I'd also like to see a compulsory vote as part of citizenship but that's another matter  whistle:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on April 12, 2011, 08:44:37 PM
Now that I would vote for..... 8)
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 13, 2011, 07:14:24 AM
The Lib Dems seem very keen on it... a reason to avoid it like the plague I would have thought...  rubschin:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 13, 2011, 07:21:08 AM
The Lib Dems seem very keen on it... a reason to avoid it like the plague I would have thought...  rubschin:

The Lib Dems will support any measure they think will help them stay in Government.
Meanwhile the Tories are agin it and Labour have a leader who says Yes and 120 MPs who have said they will campaign for a No....... You will note that none of them have asked those who they represent which way they should vote.

This side of Offa's Dyke we also have to contend with a buggers muddle of a different system (part first past the post and part "selection" from party lists) on the same day which will inevitably lead to another unholy alliance in Cardiff.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: tel on April 13, 2011, 10:14:41 AM
Quote from AV leaflet

If more people vote ‘yes’ than ‘no’, when will we start using the ‘alternative vote’ system?

The ‘alternative vote’ system will be used after a review of the boundaries of the area that each MP represents (known as their constituency) is completed. This is due to happen between 2011 and 2013. The review will happen regardless of the outcome of this referendum.
At the end of the review, the UK Parliament will vote on implementing the new boundaries. If the new boundaries are implemented, the ‘alternative vote’ system will be used for all future elections to the House of Commons.


The last sentence seems to imply that the referendum can be negated by a vote on new boundaries.
What is the point then?
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 13, 2011, 10:20:03 AM
Quote from AV leaflet

If more people vote ‘yes’ than ‘no’, when will we start using the ‘alternative vote’ system?

The ‘alternative vote’ system will be used after a review of the boundaries of the area that each MP represents (known as their constituency) is completed. This is due to happen between 2011 and 2013. The review will happen regardless of the outcome of this referendum.
At the end of the review, the UK Parliament will vote on implementing the new boundaries. If the new boundaries are implemented, the ‘alternative vote’ system will be used for all future elections to the House of Commons.


The last sentence seems to imply that the referendum can be negated by a vote on new boundaries.
What is the point then?

Quite so...

Whoever you vote for you get the government - they make sure of that....  noooo:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on April 18, 2011, 07:34:32 PM
http://captainranty.blogspot.com/2011/04/turning-tables.html (http://captainranty.blogspot.com/2011/04/turning-tables.html)   spider:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on April 18, 2011, 07:42:08 PM
It's gonna be such a great day  noooo:

Predicted turnout ...one man and their dog

Alerts been put out as some kind of campaign being organised to turn up in large groups just before closing time to create mayhem  ::)

Electoral Commission has ordained that no explanation is allowed to be given on the day to any voter turning up confused as to what AV is about. Not allowed to say anything. Such a helpful approach  noooo:

Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 18, 2011, 07:43:00 PM
It's gonna be such a great day  noooo:

Predicted turnout ...one man and their dog

Alerts been put out as some kind of campaign being organised to turn up in large groups just before closing time to create mayhem  ::)

Electoral Commission has ordained that no explanation is allowed to be given on the day to any voter turning up confused as to what AV is about. Not allowed to say anything. Such a helpful approach  noooo:



Perhaps you could explain now then... beforehand like...  whistle:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on April 18, 2011, 07:44:25 PM
You're an overseas voter ...you can bog off - you don't count  whistle:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 18, 2011, 07:45:01 PM
You're an overseas voter ...you can bog off - you don't count  whistle:

 sad32:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 19, 2011, 06:48:54 AM
 happy100
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Grumpmeister on April 19, 2011, 06:53:30 AM
This whole sham is pure PR and bugger all else, the politicians know that the majority of us have lost all faith in the system because there is no difference between one party of arrogant money grabbing bastards and another and so think that by looking at options to 'change' things we will all be happy complacent cash machines again.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 19, 2011, 06:55:22 AM
Interesting that Cameron is a NO when he got elected to Party Leader by AV  whistle:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 19, 2011, 07:40:20 AM
Interesting that Cameron is a NO when he got elected to Party Leader by AV  whistle:

The bastard was on the wireless this morning - I had to leave the room!  cussing:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 19, 2011, 02:18:11 PM
How come we are only given a choice of yes or no. Surely we should have a number of different voting systems on the form and we then put them in order of our preference.  rubschin:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on April 19, 2011, 02:23:52 PM
How come we are only given a choice of yes or no. Surely we should have a number of different voting systems on the form and we then put them in order of our preference.  rubschin:

 lol: lol: lol:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 19, 2011, 02:51:05 PM
How come we are only given a choice of yes or no. Surely we should have a number of different voting systems on the form and we then put them in order of our preference.  rubschin:

 lol: lol: lol: lol: lol: lol:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 19, 2011, 07:10:18 PM
How come we are only given a choice of yes or no. Surely we should have a number of different voting systems on the form and we then put them in order of our preference.  rubschin:

 happy001 happy001 happy001 happy001

Splendid UM!
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on April 24, 2011, 09:18:50 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21kcNddVmO0&feature=player_embedded#at=99

Splendid.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 25, 2011, 07:04:33 AM
As David Cameron is such an obviously well brought up chap you'd have thought the answers to the AV question would have been better phrased.

Yes please or No thank you ...... so much nicer, don't you think?
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: beerhead on April 25, 2011, 07:08:20 AM
IF voting changed anything it would soon be made illegal.


I'd like compulsory voting with a "none of the above" option. If that option is the winner, start again, with new candidates.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on April 25, 2011, 07:39:40 AM
IF voting changed anything it would soon be made illegal.


I'd like compulsory voting with a "none of the above" option. If that option is the winner, start again, with new candidates.

 rubschin:
The problem I see with that idea is that one so seldom knows the candidates well enough to make judgement. I personally vote on party lines not individuals and that puts me in a quandary as our local sitting MP is a nice chap, a good local MP, always readily accessible to his constituents, does much work for them, supports many local initiatives and really does put in a lot of effort so deserves support. Unfortunately he is (i) Welsh (ii) Labour AND (iii) Toes the Party Line ...... so much as I like the chap and even admire his diligence he will never get my vote.

My personal preference for a "Voting Method" would be to leave out candidates names and simply vote for the party that one feels best able to support.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: tel on April 25, 2011, 05:56:50 PM
I rather like the system that was once used in Dr Who and previously some book wot I read.

Every 6-12 months, everyone gets to vote (electronically, from home), basically a thumbs up or thumbs down system.

Thumbs up, leader is left in office, with all the pleasures they desire.

Thumbs down, leader is electrocuted and a new candidate is found.

Nice easy incentive system.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on April 25, 2011, 06:16:23 PM
I would love to torture  Gordon  Broon  eveilgrin:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on April 26, 2011, 07:39:09 AM
Mandelsnake advocates a YES vote. Well that has confirmed my opinion then. NO it is.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Just One More on April 26, 2011, 07:53:59 AM
I've yet to see a "Say yes to AV" poster/banner/leaflet, 100's of "No" ones though  confused:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on April 26, 2011, 08:05:46 AM
Goodold Guido

http://order-order.com/2011/04/26/desperate-yes-deploy-mandy/ (http://order-order.com/2011/04/26/desperate-yes-deploy-mandy/)
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Pastis on April 26, 2011, 03:43:29 PM
You can of course vote Yes and then only tick 1 candidate   razz:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 26, 2011, 05:55:48 PM
You can of course vote Yes and then only tick 1 candidate   razz:

True, but other voters will list their preferences. Personally I vote for one candidate, where the others come is of no interest to me. I shall be voting against AV.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Nick on May 06, 2011, 07:34:11 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13297573 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13297573)

Yay  cloud9:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on May 06, 2011, 09:19:49 PM
A predictable result.

You cannot fool the Great British Public ~ If it ain't broke, don't fix it.  razz:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Snoopy on May 07, 2011, 05:47:56 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yorkshirepost.co.uk%2Fwebimage%2Fnlyp_publication_logo_7_39419%21image%2F1735919879.png_gen%2Fderivatives%2Fdefault%2F1735919879.png&hash=d95d9b9983b7192eb4d7d4ecce181066730dc0b1)
Quote
YORKSHIRE delivered an overwhelming “no” verdict in the additional vote referendum as the country sent a clear message that could kill off any voting reform for a generation.

There is no truth in the rumour that special voting papers offering a choice between
"Is it your round?"
Answer
"Aye alw-reet" OR "Nay Lad" were used
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: beerhead on May 07, 2011, 09:35:34 AM
20% of the electorate have spoken. Still, at least it's a bloody nose for Knobhead Clegg.
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on May 07, 2011, 09:38:49 AM
20% of the electorate have spoken. Still, at least it's a bloody nose for Knobhead Clegg.

Hopefully more than that!  eveilgrin:

More than a bloody nose I mean, not more than 20% like....  ;)

I'm thinking of a fatal wound...
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on May 07, 2011, 09:39:39 AM
SO how long before they get a new leader for the Lib Dems ?.....place your bets  whistle:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Barman on May 07, 2011, 09:40:35 AM
SO how long before they get a new leader for the Lib Dems ?.....place your bets  whistle:

What time is it now?  lol: lol: lol:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Miss Demeanour on May 07, 2011, 09:47:30 AM
Quote
Nick Clegg is about as pointless as the lid on a McFlurry
lol:
Title: Re: The AV referendum
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 07, 2011, 10:03:09 AM
Turnout 42% -yet again apathy won.