The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => The Commons => Topic started by: Snoopy on June 11, 2008, 05:36:59 AM

Title: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Snoopy on June 11, 2008, 05:36:59 AM
We really have ignored this one, prolly 'cos it is too silly for words, but the latest on the BBC News site says that in order to "get it through" the Government are going to agree to pay anyone detained for more than 28 days without a charge being laid against them compensation of £3000 for each day over the 28!
It seems no expense will be spared to enable Gordo to get his own way. If true it is the most childish gesture I have ever seen from anyone over the age of five. The man really has lost all sense of proportion. His mother should have smacked the sulky little beast when he was younger.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7447477.stm
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Grumpmeister on June 11, 2008, 08:01:15 AM
 The power hungry scots arse has finally lost the plot noooo:

For 3 grand a day what do l have to do to get locked up?
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Darwins Selection on June 11, 2008, 08:05:09 AM
£42,000 for sitting around chatting to some young coppers for a couple of weeks.  rubschin:

Who is going to grass me up for buying large quantities of fertiliser that could be used to make bombs?

Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Barman on June 11, 2008, 08:54:13 AM
£42,000 for sitting around chatting to some young coppers for a couple of weeks.  rubschin:

Who is going to grass me up for buying large quantities of fertiliser that could be used to make bombs?


What will our cut be?  whistle:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: TG on June 11, 2008, 09:31:30 AM
Who needs a cut? If we start a 'fertiliser bomb' thread or similar GCHQ will pick it up and we will all get banged up for a few weeks before they realise we are harmless loonies. Then we can all make a fortune.  happy088
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Barman on June 11, 2008, 09:34:05 AM
Who needs a cut? If we start a 'fertiliser bomb' thread or similar GCHQ will pick it up and we will all get banged up for a few weeks before they realise we are harmless loonies. Then we can all make a fortune.  happy088
True!

They'll prolly give us Intermong access too so we can carry on as normal!  cloud9:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Bar Wench on June 11, 2008, 11:42:36 AM
Excellent! Where do I sign up!  cloud9:

Lock me up with a tv for the duration of Big Brother and pay me for the joy of it!  cloud9:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Nick on June 11, 2008, 11:44:20 AM
Quote
harmless loonies

Speak for yerself!
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Darwins Selection on June 11, 2008, 12:57:08 PM
Quote
harmless loonies

Speak for yerself!

Don't feel excluded Nick.

I am sure he meant the harmful ones as well.
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Grumpmeister on June 11, 2008, 01:07:26 PM
Excellent! Where do I sign up!  cloud9:

Lock me up with a tv for the duration of Big Brother and pay me for the joy of it!  cloud9:

Unfortunately exposing inmates to the hell that is Big Brother is illegal under the HRA Wenchy.  point:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Nick on June 11, 2008, 01:08:11 PM
 angry041:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Bar Wench on June 11, 2008, 01:16:22 PM
Excellent! Where do I sign up!  cloud9:

Lock me up with a tv for the duration of Big Brother and pay me for the joy of it!  cloud9:

Unfortunately exposing inmates to the hell that is Big Brother is illegal under the HRA Wenchy.  point:

But what if you wanted to be exposed?  redface:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Grumpmeister on June 11, 2008, 01:24:14 PM
Then I believe they hold you under the mental health act  whistle:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Bar Wench on June 11, 2008, 01:29:36 PM
 redface:





 rubschin:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Grumpmeister on June 11, 2008, 01:47:58 PM
BB is the soft version anyway. You want to see the Ted Nugent version if/when that comes back on again (I have a feeling that the contestant who was injured during a task where he had to stand on a track and play chicken with a speeding pick up truck may have scared the studio execs somewhat).
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Barman on June 11, 2008, 06:04:20 PM
Brown wins crunch vote on 42 days

Quote from: BBC Web Shite
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has narrowly won a House of Commons vote on extending the maximum time police can hold terror suspects to 42 days.

It appears 37 Labour MPs joined forces with Conservative and Lib Dems to vote against the proposals.

But that was not enough to defeat the plan ministers claim is needed to deal with complex terror plots.

It was passed by 315 MPs to 306 votes. It will come as a big boost to Mr Brown after his recent troubles.

Source (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7449268.stm)

Wankers!  cussing:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Snoopy on June 11, 2008, 06:11:21 PM
I think the whole country knows that he had to buy those votes and they also know those who were willing to be bought. I foresee many of them being out of a job come the General Election.
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Uncle Mort on June 12, 2008, 08:55:13 AM
Why didn't my MP hold out for a new hospital or something?  cussing:
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Snoopy on June 12, 2008, 09:03:33 AM
Well we know who to vote for and who not.

Quote
LABOUR MPs VOTING AGAINST GOVERNMENT

Diane Abbott
Richard Burden
Katy Clark
Harry Cohen
Frank Cook
Jeremy Corbyn
Jim Cousins
Andrew Dismore
Frank Dobson
David Drew
Paul Farrelly
Mark Fisher
Paul Flynn
Neil Gerrard
Ian Gibson
Roger Godsiff
John Grogan
Dai Havard
Kate Hoey
Kelvin Hopkins
Glenda Jackson
Lynne Jones
Peter Kilfoyle
Andrew MacKinlay
Bob Marshall-Andrews
John McDonnell
Michael Meacher
Julie Morgan
Chris Mullin
Douglas Naysmith
Gordon Prentice
Linda Riordan
Alan Simpson
Emily Thornberry
David Winnick
Mike Wood


CONSERVATIVE MP VOTING WITH GOVERNMENT

Ann Widdecombe       


DUP MPs WHO BACKED GOVERNMENT

Gregory Campbell
Nigel Dodds
Jeffrey Donaldson
The Rev William McCrea
The Rev Ian Paisley       
Iris Robinson
Peter Robinson
David Simpson
Sammy Wilson

Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Barman on June 12, 2008, 10:37:23 AM
Still... It'll be kicked-out in The Lords... won't it?
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Grumpmeister on June 12, 2008, 10:40:49 AM
Still... It'll be kicked-out in The Lords... won't it?

Depends on how many peerages Tony sol...er...handed out.
Title: Re: Proposed 42 day detention without charge
Post by: Snoopy on June 12, 2008, 10:44:16 AM
I suspect the Lords will amend it heavily and send it back, Gordo will have another strop and threaten to use the "Parliament Act" to force it through, compromises will be reached and everyone will claim to have won. Meanwhile expect to see Ian Paisley Knighted (at least) and more money poured from London into Nor'n Ireland than you would have believed possible ~ starting with £200million proceeds from the upcoming water privatisation in the six counties.