The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => The Snug => Topic started by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 10:24:38 AM

Title: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 10:24:38 AM
Have just run the MIL back to her bus home and dropped in to the house we rent out to deliver the new fire extinguisher. We put the old one in the car and set off home.

Boy in the back: "Daddy, what is this little pull ring thingy for?"
Me: "That is what sets off the fire extinguisher. So don't fiddle with it"
Boy in the back: "So if you pull it out stuff comes out and stops a fire."
Me: "Yes, so don't fiddle with it, OK?"

SIlence. Small sound of fiddling. Then fucking great whoosh and some screaming. It's amazing how much CO2  they can pack into those things. I opened the car windows and we proceeded up the high street with CO2 sort of billowing out of the windows. Could have been foam, I spose. evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 10:26:16 AM
 happy001 happy001 happy001
Oh Bless Him.  ;)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 10:27:28 AM
It seems to be pensioners shopping day here. I imagine some may be in a state of shock
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 10:31:31 AM
Why didn?t you play a game to keep him occupied?  noooo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sniauk-GD6E
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 10:53:23 AM
Very good evil: We do play that game in the car. He spent a whole hour once trying to guess "S P" ona motorway trip
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 10:57:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41mgUqCGD3U&mode=related&search=
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:00:02 AM
That one is all too familiar thank you evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 11:01:13 AM
Fire Extinguisher in boot ~ Boy in car
Fire extinguisher in car ~ Boy in Boot
Either would have been safer given a degree of thought.  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:01:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WRNjHUgOh4&mode=related&search=
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:07:21 AM
That also, is familiar evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:10:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq2hcsSdjD0&mode=related&search=
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:13:49 AM
That too is familiar evil:

Do you have children Barman. If not, do you want one?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:14:56 AM
That too is familiar evil:

Do you have children Barman. If not, do you want one?
Just the one thanks...  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:19:26 AM
That would be you then?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:25:09 AM
That would be you then?
lol: lol: lol: lol: lol:
Smite
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 04, 2007, 11:35:19 AM
My first thought was much the same as Snoopy's, you should have kept The Boy and the extinguisher well separated.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:36:57 AM
Ah? the benefit of hindsight.  noooo:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:38:25 AM
I spend my entire life enjoying the benefits of hindsight evil:

The car windows are all smeary for some reason cry:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:42:07 AM
I spend my entire life enjoying the benefits of hindsight evil:

The car windows are all smeary for some reason cry:
Think yourself lucky that they banned Halon as an extinguishant some years ago because of the ozone layer?  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:42:53 AM
Bugger the ozone layer. My car!
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:44:47 AM
Bugger the ozone layer. My car!
Halon is the best product to put a fire out but is quite toxic and would have ruined the inside of your car.  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:45:14 AM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 11:52:49 AM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 11:55:56 AM
Good job it was only CO2 then! scared2:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Grumpmeister on September 04, 2007, 12:00:08 PM
Have just run the MIL back to her bus home and dropped in to the house we rent out to deliver the new fire extinguisher. We put the old one in the car and set off home.

Boy in the back: "Daddy, what is this little pull ring thingy for?"
Me: "That is what sets off the fire extinguisher. So don't fiddle with it"
Boy in the back: "So if you pull it out stuff comes out and stops a fire."
Me: "Yes, so don't fiddle with it, OK?"

SIlence. Small sound of fiddling. Then fucking great whoosh and some screaming. It's amazing how much CO2  they can pack into those things. I opened the car windows and we proceeded up the high street with CO2 sort of billowing out of the windows. Could have been foam, I spose. evil:

At the very least you should have realised that telling him not to fiddle with it would be a red rag to a bull  doh:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 04, 2007, 12:00:12 PM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).


I have this distinct recollection of BCF being phased in by the RAF in the 60's to replace the old ones which contained something whose name escapes me, but which was much prized as a dry cleaning agent leading to lots of empty fire extinguishers.

Can anyone recall its name?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 12:01:29 PM
Have just run the MIL back to her bus home and dropped in to the house we rent out to deliver the new fire extinguisher. We put the old one in the car and set off home.

Boy in the back: "Daddy, what is this little pull ring thingy for?"
Me: "That is what sets off the fire extinguisher. So don't fiddle with it"
Boy in the back: "So if you pull it out stuff comes out and stops a fire."
Me: "Yes, so don't fiddle with it, OK?"

SIlence. Small sound of fiddling. Then fucking great whoosh and some screaming. It's amazing how much CO2  they can pack into those things. I opened the car windows and we proceeded up the high street with CO2 sort of billowing out of the windows. Could have been foam, I spose. evil:

At the very least you should have realised that telling him not to fiddle with it would be a red rag to a bull  doh:

True. The technical term is contra-suggestible.

OK?

See also: "Don't fall into that rock pool."
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 12:02:28 PM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).


I have this distinct recollection of BCF being phased in by the RAF in the 60's to replace the old ones which contained something whose name escapes me, but which was much prized as a dry cleaning agent leading to lots of empty fire extinguishers.

Can anyone recall its name?
Percoethylene?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 04, 2007, 12:03:16 PM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).


I have this distinct recollection of BCF being phased in by the RAF in the 60's to replace the old ones which contained something whose name escapes me, but which was much prized as a dry cleaning agent leading to lots of empty fire extinguishers.

Can anyone recall its name?
Percoethylene?

No, that wasn't it - and nor was contra-suggestible

For some reason, the term 'tetra' is wandering round my head  rubschin:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 12:06:24 PM
Carbon tetrachloride
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 04, 2007, 12:10:05 PM
Carbon tetrachloride

That's the badger!!

Bloody memory  evil: It's getting worse as I'm getting . . . (now what's that word? Means not as young.) Oh bugger, I think I'll just go and have a lie down somewhere quiet - I may be gone a while.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:10:56 PM
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).


I have this distinct recollection of BCF being phased in by the RAF in the 60's to replace the old ones which contained something whose name escapes me, but which was much prized as a dry cleaning agent leading to lots of empty fire extinguishers.

Can anyone recall its name?

Probably wrong but the following come to mind as "dry cleaning agents" but I don't know if they were used in Fire Extinguishers.
Tetrachloroethylene. Also known as perchloroethylene (Perc)
Another I recall was CFC 113, a chlorofluorocarbon solvent.
There was something that was marketed, in a little jar with a cloth pad under the screw off lid ... Dabitoff was it's trade name. I think the active ingredient was called something like Carbon-tetrachloride.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 12:11:35 PM
That is the stuff they use in dry cleaners. Stinks!
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 12:12:49 PM
Carbon tetrachloride

That's the badger!!

Bloody memory  evil: It's getting worse as I'm getting . . . (now what's that word? Means not as young.) Oh bugger, I think I'll just go and have a lie down somewhere quiet - I may be gone a while.
Exposure to high concentrations of carbon tetrachloride can affect the central nervous system.  scared2:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 12:13:46 PM
Good job it was CO2 then
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:14:49 PM
Good job it was CO2 then

Yep ~ always look on the bright side of life. lol:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 12:18:41 PM
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: tel on September 04, 2007, 12:23:16 PM
There was also trike - trichloroethylene I think.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Grumpmeister on September 04, 2007, 12:23:47 PM
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ‘plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all…  noooo:

Was his name Nick perchance?  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:24:05 PM
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 12:25:02 PM
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
The UK...  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:26:40 PM
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
The UK...  whistle:

Bradford, Leeds, Sheffield? Amounts to much the same thing really  ::)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 12:28:36 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:38:10 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 04, 2007, 12:47:59 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.

Now that's s term I quite like! I'll have to remember that one, it describes the ex-SWTSMBO's new spouse to a 'T'.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Bar Wench on September 04, 2007, 12:50:01 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.

Now that's s term I quite like! I'll have to remember that one, it describes the ex-SWTSMBO's new spouse to a 'T'.

The ex-who-what now?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 12:53:52 PM
Family life is so complex nowadays noooo:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 12:56:04 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.

Now that's s term I quite like! I'll have to remember that one, it describes the ex-SWTSMBO's new spouse to a 'T'.

The ex-who-what now?

I'm guessing at She Who Thought She Must Be Obeyed.

As for Husband in Law ~ What else would you call your ex-wife's new husband? I tried "Replacement" but it led to many requests for explanation.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Bar Wench on September 04, 2007, 01:00:31 PM
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.


Now that's s term I quite like! I'll have to remember that one, it describes the ex-SWTSMBO's new spouse to a 'T'.

The ex-who-what now?

I'm guessing at She Who Thought She Must Be Obeyed.

As for Husband in Law ~ What else would you call your ex-wife's new husband? I tried "Replacement" but it led to many requests for explanation.


Unfortunate Bastard
He who does not know
Git

Depends on the circumstances that the ex became ex.
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 01:03:21 PM
Substitute?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Snoopy on September 04, 2007, 01:13:49 PM
"Saviour" came to mind at the time  evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Bar Wench on September 04, 2007, 01:14:09 PM
"Saviour" came to mind at the time  evil:


 point:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 04, 2007, 01:27:17 PM
He will always be 'unnamed co-respondent' to me  cussing: 
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Bar Wench on September 04, 2007, 01:29:16 PM
He will always be 'unnamed co-respondent' to me  cussing: 


 happy100
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Misunderstood on September 04, 2007, 02:00:16 PM
Ahem, foam?  Anybody?  rubschin:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:07:13 PM
Odd how they stray. Could be a PhD in this.

My car smells funny now. Does CO2 have a funny smell?

Admittedly, it could be the cat shit he trod in earlier..........
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Misunderstood on September 04, 2007, 02:23:43 PM
Odd how they stray. Could be a PhD in this.

My car smells funny now. Does CO2 have a funny smell?

Admittedly, it could be the cat shit he trod in earlier..........

Maybe The Boy shat himself when it went off....  ;D
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:24:33 PM
No, I had to wash his shoe. And the carpet. And the back of my seat. evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 02:40:05 PM
Admittedly, it could be the cat shit he trod in earlier..........
Did he have his shoes or plimsolls on?  point:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:40:44 PM
Shoes, why?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 02:43:30 PM
Shoes, why?
Well, if he?d changed into his plimsolls when he got into the car it wouldn?t stink of cat shit would it?  point:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:48:06 PM
Some of us don't carry spare shoes around with us. evil:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 02:49:08 PM
Some of us don't carry spare shoes around with us. evil:
Good idea though ? you should suggest it at the school?  whistle:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:51:32 PM
Where is that "my head is spinning" emoticon when you need it?
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 02:57:53 PM
Where is that "my head is spinning" emoticon when you need it?
This one?
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fad%2Fweee.gif&hash=abd3a8b66e06130441b18d95f0ca6bc1b04415f5) (http://www.freesmileys.org)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 02:58:47 PM
Have you forgotten my advice already? whip:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 03:01:00 PM
Have you forgotten my advice already? whip:
Sorry...
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fad%2Fflowers.gif&hash=ca49eebf6f00ccf812540af3914d4c9f2734b553) (http://www.freesmileys.org)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 03:01:25 PM
 whip: whip: whip: whip: whip:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Barman on September 04, 2007, 03:02:02 PM
whip: whip: whip: whip: whip:
I can't help it...
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fad%2Fgroupwave.gif&hash=18cc03610701fd076af92364408fcf9e1b4c7def) (http://www.freesmileys.org)
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 04, 2007, 03:17:51 PM
Where is that "my head is spinning" emoticon when you need it?
This one?
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fad%2Fweee.gif&hash=abd3a8b66e06130441b18d95f0ca6bc1b04415f5) (http://www.freesmileys.org)

That's a Mozoticon that is. He's always upside down seeing as how he inhabits the antipodes!
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on September 04, 2007, 03:18:31 PM
Too true. And quite good.








I really should do some work................ noooo:
Title: Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
Post by: Nick on February 04, 2016, 11:14:13 AM
I'd forgotten about this!! razz: