Disgusterous

Author Topic: Maths question  (Read 15015 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 155060
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Maths question
« Reply #90 on: December 31, 2009, 02:16:48 PM »
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Please don't start this again  sad24:

Why not?
Fantastic entertainment.

Think I finally got it right anyway. happy088

Total sales + 15% + 5.5%, the 5.5% the bit that is payable, less the vat incured on my new van, but ONLY if its total value BEFORE vat was over ?2000, anything UNDER ?2000 purchase price for start up reasons HAS to be claimed on the first vat return only, but anything OVER ?2000 purchase price exc. vat can be claimed for anytime in the future.
Have I made that quite clear do you think? rubschin:


Except it is 17?% from tomorrer like...  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Maths question
« Reply #91 on: December 31, 2009, 02:18:30 PM »
Quite so BM.  More pain beckons  noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #92 on: December 31, 2009, 02:18:42 PM »
...oh yes, and it all changes again tomorrow apparently due to the increase of vat to 17.5%

Seems I will have to pay an increased 6.5% on all sales INC vat @17.5%, but only until the end of November, when MY vat payable will go up to 7.5%...apparently.

Simples really in'it?

Any questions?
Please don't hestate to ask the vat guru of the pub, thank you. Prefewr Glenfidich though tbqath. cloud9:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Maths question
« Reply #93 on: December 31, 2009, 02:20:38 PM »
I think you will find that is wrong  angel1
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #94 on: December 31, 2009, 02:22:46 PM »
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Please don't start this again  sad24:

Why not?
Fantastic entertainment.

Think I finally got it right anyway. happy088

Total sales + 15% + 5.5%, the 5.5% the bit that is payable, less the vat incured on my new van, but ONLY if its total value BEFORE vat was over ?2000, anything UNDER ?2000 purchase price for start up reasons HAS to be claimed on the first vat return only, but anything OVER ?2000 purchase price exc. vat can be claimed for anytime in the future.
Have I made that quite clear do you think? rubschin:


Except it is 17?% from tomorrer like...  noooo:

Ahhhhh, no you see. All vat returns...as far as I know...were sent out for completion BEFORE the old rate is re-introduced again tomorrow, so EVERYTHING on the vat return will be at 15%. New vat 1/4 starts tomorrow, even though in my case it wasn't actyually due to start until March1st.
That betterer now ey?

Good job I've got a well clear and mathmatical 'ed ey?
« Last Edit: December 31, 2009, 02:25:56 PM by GROWLER »

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #95 on: December 31, 2009, 02:25:01 PM »
I think you will find that is wrong  angel1

I think you'll find that it is YOU that is wrong, cus you see, I RANG THE VAT OFFICE UP TO CLARIFY EVERYTHING YESTERDAY, so up yours Charlie. Finger:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Maths question
« Reply #96 on: December 31, 2009, 02:25:40 PM »
They have misled you I fear. \The situation is far more complex than you realise
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #97 on: December 31, 2009, 02:28:32 PM »
They have misled you I fear. \The situation is far more complex than you realise

You'd luv that wouldn't you, ey, wouldn't you?  ::)

What exactly is it that you don't seem to be grasping ey, what...exactly like?

Re-read me posts. They do actually make sense to a normal person. whistle:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Maths question
« Reply #98 on: December 31, 2009, 02:32:44 PM »
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Maths question
« Reply #99 on: December 31, 2009, 02:40:52 PM »
VAT ought to be simple.

Charging tax on whatever you spend is not a complex idea and the principle, under various names, has been around for a very long time and I personally think it a fairer system than taxing what we earn. The more you spend the more tax you pay makes sense and of course unless you earn you cannot spend. Those that choose to save have a good incentive as well. Save your cash and don't pay so much tax. Put VAT on everything and scrap income tax would be a really good idea ~ that way we all have a choice.
My objection to VAT is that the Government want anyone in business to act as an unpaid tax collector for them. cussing:

When we had the pubs I spent hours and hours doing the bloody VAT returns. Booze, like patrol and motor cars is one of those where you pay tax on tax. Alcohol "duty" is added to the cost price of the booze, then profit margin goes on and the whole is subject to VAT. That is nothing short of fvcking scandalous.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #100 on: December 31, 2009, 02:50:44 PM »

My objection to VAT is that the Government want anyone in business to act as an unpaid tax collector for them. cussing:



Not only that...which is 100% correct of course, but the arse wipes now make you...the unpaid tax collector... pay the postage on the envelope to return the return too!

I was going to write OHMS on the top, but thought better of getting onto the wrong side of HM Customs and Excercise. noooo:
Bastards though all the same. evil:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Maths question
« Reply #102 on: December 31, 2009, 03:04:16 PM »

My objection to VAT is that the Government want anyone in business to act as an unpaid tax collector for them. cussing:



Not only that...which is 100% correct of course, but the arse wipes now make you...the unpaid tax collector... pay the postage on the envelope to return the return too!

I was going to write OHMS on the top, but thought better of getting onto the wrong side of HM Customs and Excercise. noooo:
Bastards though all the same. evil:

I once complained to a visiting VATman that I was expected to pay postage for them.
"You can always drop it in by hand" he smirked.

Like I am going to drive, at my expense, from Hampshire to your offices in Glasgow ...... you utter arsewipe  cussing:
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Maths question
« Reply #103 on: December 31, 2009, 03:09:56 PM »
Could have sworn the envelope was pre-paid last time I was vat registered.  rubschin:

Maybe it wasn't, but then I can't understand why I wouldn't have kicked off about it if that WAS the case.
Most odd. I must be getting grumpier and picking up on these things now. ::)

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 109700
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Maths question
« Reply #104 on: December 31, 2009, 03:11:39 PM »
Post it with no stamp on  eveilgrin:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile