Author Topic: 4k or not to 4k  (Read 6379 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TG

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4677
  • Reputation: 0
4k or not to 4k
« on: November 18, 2016, 07:23:03 PM »
I have bought a 4k TV.

It is an inch bigger than my last non 4k (and therfore useless non 4k) tv.

I have upgrded my Xbox One to an Xbox one plus thingy that has 4k output I think, though i could be wrong.

Right...

Ready....

Go on then....

 tunble:

Battlefield 1 is pretty good though.

 :thumbsup:




I think my cat wants to kill me...

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 37907
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2016, 08:26:46 PM »
The local independent games shop has had so many people trading in their old PS4's for the new all singing all dancing ones that he is selling them pre-owned for around £120 (a lot of them still within their warranty) just to clear some storage space....

4K is like 3D, doesn't seem to work on me.....

Must.........resist.....temptation
I do not have ducks. I do not have a row. I have squirrels and they are all at a rave.

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 156647
  • Reputation: -52
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2016, 06:28:09 AM »
My new tellybox is 4k...  confused:

Buy a new TV and justify it by putting the old one in the bedroom you say...?  rubschin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2016, 09:08:52 AM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 110441
  • Reputation: -116
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2016, 09:12:21 AM »
 :thumbsup:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 156647
  • Reputation: -52
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2016, 09:36:56 AM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.

 razz:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 66762
  • Reputation: -4
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2016, 11:11:17 AM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.
Noggin the Nog was never as good afterwards
Well, whatever, nevermind

Offline TG

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4677
  • Reputation: 0
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2016, 12:48:58 PM »
My new tellybox is 4k...  confused:

Buy a new TV and justify it by putting the old one in the bedroom you say...?  rubschin:

Never fails.  :thumbsup:
I think my cat wants to kill me...

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 156647
  • Reputation: -52
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2016, 01:08:14 PM »
My new tellybox is 4k...  confused:

Buy a new TV and justify it by putting the old one in the bedroom you say...?  rubschin:

Never fails.  :thumbsup:

 inane:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 37907
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2016, 07:49:36 PM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.

It meant you could have larger tapestries Mr Darwin sir...  whistle:
I do not have ducks. I do not have a row. I have squirrels and they are all at a rave.

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 156647
  • Reputation: -52
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2016, 08:52:52 PM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.

It meant you could have larger tapestries Mr Darwin sir...  whistle:

 drumroll:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2016, 11:24:59 PM »
I couldn't see why they changed from 405 to 625 lines.

It meant you could have larger tapestries Mr Darwin sir...  whistle:

 drumroll:
cloud9:
I mostly despair

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 37907
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2017, 12:36:12 AM »
Battlefield 1 is pretty good though.

 :thumbsup:

Bloody difficult in places but damn good. Just found out that my pc, despite being so old that Dell don't make the model anymore, is happily running it.  cloud9:
I do not have ducks. I do not have a row. I have squirrels and they are all at a rave.

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 156647
  • Reputation: -52
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2017, 01:51:53 PM »
Just joined the 4K club...  cloud9:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 66762
  • Reputation: -4
Re: 4k or not to 4k
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2017, 03:05:53 PM »
Just joined the 4K club...  cloud9:
A cautious  :thumbsup:  What you going to use as 4k signal?

Please don't do what my brother did.  Bought an HD TV and for years fed it with a SCART lead  ::).  Then bought a 4K TV but still drives it through an HD only box  ::).

Well, whatever, nevermind