Disgusterous

Author Topic: Surely the question should be  (Read 20346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline apc2010

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 57580
  • Reputation: -2
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #90 on: February 22, 2020, 01:00:58 PM »
So you were one of the 2 animals convicted for the murder of Damilola Taylor, served 5 out of your 8 year sentence but were recalled to custody 3 times for constantly breaking the terms of your parole and now you are back in serving a 4 year sentence for driving into a police officer. Let's be clear here, deliberately reversing at speed into someone as they are getting out of a car should not be considered dangerous driving but attempted murder although given the paltry sentence you had for murdering a 10 year old boy it probably wouldn't change anything.

While there are those out there who think that criminals should get second chances and rehabilitation, how many chances are we supposed to give them. In cases like this animal there should either be true life imprisonment without parole or a .44 to the back of the head.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8029907/One-Damilola-Taylors-killers-jailed-four-years-dangerous-driving.html

 noooo:

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #91 on: February 22, 2020, 02:11:10 PM »
So you were one of the 2 animals convicted for the murder of Damilola Taylor, served 5 out of your 8 year sentence but were recalled to custody 3 times for constantly breaking the terms of your parole and now you are back in serving a 4 year sentence for driving into a police officer. Let's be clear here, deliberately reversing at speed into someone as they are getting out of a car should not be considered dangerous driving but attempted murder although given the paltry sentence you had for murdering a 10 year old boy it probably wouldn't change anything.

While there are those out there who think that criminals should get second chances and rehabilitation, how many chances are we supposed to give them. In cases like this animal there should either be true life imprisonment without parole or a .44 to the back of the head.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8029907/One-Damilola-Taylors-killers-jailed-four-years-dangerous-driving.html

 noooo:
noooo: noooo:

CPS again, going for the easy conviction that makes their stats look good
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #92 on: June 17, 2020, 05:39:59 PM »
So 103 previous arrests including 3 this year, registered sex offender and has a history of violence. Why the hell was he allowed back on the streets in the first damn place? When a criminal with a history of violence is clearly not going to change their ways then your duty is to make sure he can't cause harm to anyone else.  Banghead

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8427245/Man-pushes-elderly-woman-92-ground-NYC-appears-hit-head-fire-hydrant.html
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 135534
  • Reputation: -49
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #93 on: June 18, 2020, 04:45:05 AM »
So 103 previous arrests including 3 this year, registered sex offender and has a history of violence. Why the hell was he allowed back on the streets in the first damn place? When a criminal with a history of violence is clearly not going to change their ways then your duty is to make sure he can't cause harm to anyone else.  Banghead

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8427245/Man-pushes-elderly-woman-92-ground-NYC-appears-hit-head-fire-hydrant.html

Madness...  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #94 on: June 18, 2020, 04:55:28 AM »
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #95 on: June 18, 2020, 11:02:53 AM »
And once again my sudden sense of impending doom turns up a notch...  Banghead

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8426637/Killer-decapitated-teenager-using-head-bowling-ball-released-early-sent-UK.html
Quite
 
I can't blame the Ozzies for wanting rid of him but couldn't one of those deals have been done where he serves more of his sentence here
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #96 on: June 18, 2020, 11:06:05 AM »
And once again my sudden sense of impending doom turns up a notch...  Banghead

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8426637/Killer-decapitated-teenager-using-head-bowling-ball-released-early-sent-UK.html
Quite
 
I can't blame the Ozzies for wanting rid of him but couldn't one of those deals have been done where he serves more of his sentence here

At the very least you should be able to hold him in a secure facility under the Mental Health Act.  rubschin:
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #97 on: June 18, 2020, 11:18:57 AM »
And once again my sudden sense of impending doom turns up a notch...  Banghead

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8426637/Killer-decapitated-teenager-using-head-bowling-ball-released-early-sent-UK.html
Quite
 
I can't blame the Ozzies for wanting rid of him but couldn't one of those deals have been done where he serves more of his sentence here

At the very least you should be able to hold him in a secure facility under the Mental Health Act.  rubschin:
it's not like we dumped our criminals on them is it


oh  redface:
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #99 on: June 24, 2020, 06:29:50 PM »
An arguable case??? I....just..........  Banghead

https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/24/prisoner-challenges-unfair-rules-stopping-early-release-terrorists-12895410/
Well we shouldn't have any unconditional early release and that's the problem the gubberment gave itself
Well, whatever nevermind

Online Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 101861
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #100 on: June 24, 2020, 06:32:08 PM »
I see Boris Johnson's dad has applied for French citizenship. whistle:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #101 on: June 24, 2020, 06:36:01 PM »
I see Boris Johnson's dad has applied for French citizenship. whistle:
Shame he didn't do it 56 years ago
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #102 on: August 08, 2020, 08:34:52 AM »
The circuit judge should be charged for gross negligence over this. Someone who was arrested and charged with for crimes including rape, strangulation and abduction and was subsequently jailed without bond in Alexandria was released under a $25k bond over coronavirus risks. You chose to release him despite knowing he was held without bond so you should be responsible for the consequences of this sick animal going back and killing his victim.

Quote
Alexandria Commonwealth’s Attorney Bryan L. Porter said Leiva and Salvato filed their motion on April 8 and Clark set the hearing for the next day, so prosecutors did not file a written response. Porter noted that under Virginia law, those charged with certain violent crimes such as rape are presumed to be a danger and are not eligible for bond.

So not only are you guilty of gross negligence but you ignored state law that made him ineligible for a bond.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2020/08/06/released-jail-height-pandemic-alexandria-rape-suspect-allegedly-killed-his-accuser/
Praise Z0rg!

Offline Steve

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 48401
  • Reputation: -3
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #103 on: August 08, 2020, 08:49:58 AM »
The circuit judge should be charged for gross negligence over this. Someone who was arrested and charged with for crimes including rape, strangulation and abduction and was subsequently jailed without bond in Alexandria was released under a $25k bond over coronavirus risks. You chose to release him despite knowing he was held without bond so you should be responsible for the consequences of this sick animal going back and killing his victim.

Quote
Alexandria Commonwealth’s Attorney Bryan L. Porter said Leiva and Salvato filed their motion on April 8 and Clark set the hearing for the next day, so prosecutors did not file a written response. Porter noted that under Virginia law, those charged with certain violent crimes such as rape are presumed to be a danger and are not eligible for bond.

So not only are you guilty of gross negligence but you ignored state law that made him ineligible for a bond.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2020/08/06/released-jail-height-pandemic-alexandria-rape-suspect-allegedly-killed-his-accuser/
noooo:
 
Well, whatever nevermind

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 28354
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Surely the question should be
« Reply #104 on: August 09, 2020, 08:04:42 PM »
As part of our anti Covid plan let's dump a load of homeless sex offenders who target children in a hotel near a playground despite it being against state law. FFS!!!  Banghead

Quote
Reached for comment on the registry listings showing the men currently live at the Belleclaire, a city rep said Friday that the listings are not accurate and that the “names you reference are not at that location.”

Asked if the men had ever lived at the hotel — and why that remained their official address — the rep declined further comment, citing confidentiality rules.

By confidentiality rules you mean 'we fucked up and are frantically covering our arses'. After all if they have never been housed there confidentiality wouldn't be an issue would it.  cussing:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8606553/Homeless-men-seen-sharing-swigs-liquor-urinating-outside-luxury-Upper-West-hotels.html

The cynic in me can't help but think that they are pulling shit like this in order to drive down property value across NYC so they can buy cheaply. Oh look, it seems that they may be and given that De Blasio already makes around $10k a month renting properties I can't help but wonder if he is taking advantage of things to increase his portfolio while blithely ignoring the economic damage he is helping cause to the city, which given the mass exodus and the ability to work from home now is something it may never recover from.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8604877/De-Blasio-says-plans-buy-properties-Manhattan.html
Praise Z0rg!