The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => The Commons => Topic started by: Grumpmeister on March 29, 2009, 12:00:11 AM

Title: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 29, 2009, 12:00:11 AM
Dick'ed Ballsup as chancellor? Christ, he is even more incompetent that Broon and Darling and that is saying something. If this corrupt mouthbreathing hypocritical shyte gets his hands on the country's finances we'd be completely buggered.  cussing:

Quote
Ed Balls had said he would "love" to be chancellor one day but stressed he is happy in his current job and pledged his full support for Alistair Darling.

The schools secretary, a former chief economic adviser to Gordon Brown, told the New Statesman he would be keen on the role of chancellor "in the future".

But he said he backed the current chancellor "100%".

Mr Balls, married to Cabinet minister Yvette Cooper, also said Labour would be led by a woman "in his lifetime".

Respect

In an interview with the magazine, Mr Balls said it would be "silly" to say he would not want to lead Labour himself one day.

But he said he was not positioning himself for a future leadership contest.

Mr Balls said the work he was now doing was only "half done" and he did not want to change job.

But he added: "Would I like to be chancellor at some point in the future? Of course I would. I'd love it."

He went on to describe Mr Darling as "brave and far-sighted".

"I think we are rightly both getting on with the jobs we've got," he said.

"Alistair and I go back a long way... I only have respect and 100% support for him."

Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Barman on March 29, 2009, 05:58:45 AM
What a shambles...  noooo:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 29, 2009, 09:14:56 AM
I see Jacki's husband has been caught downloading porn films at public expense  whistle:


 point: point: point: point: point:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Uncle Mort on March 29, 2009, 09:17:22 AM
Wouldn't you if you were married to her? Anyway she's always round at her sister's.

Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 29, 2009, 09:18:22 AM
If I was married to her I would want her to spend as much time away from home as possible  evil:


http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165611/Blue-movies-expenses-How-Jacqui-Smiths-husband-watched-pornographic-movies--paid-taxpayer.html (http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165611/Blue-movies-expenses-How-Jacqui-Smiths-husband-watched-pornographic-movies--paid-taxpayer.html)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Uncle Mort on March 29, 2009, 09:20:15 AM
Seriously ~ I wonder how long she's been claiming? And why should we be paying for them to watch films?  cussing:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 29, 2009, 09:21:25 AM
This guy needs stringing up too  cussing:

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165337/We-told-Go-spend-boys-says-MP-claimed-310-000-holiday-home.html (http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165337/We-told-Go-spend-boys-says-MP-claimed-310-000-holiday-home.html)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Uncle Mort on March 29, 2009, 09:23:33 AM
Defiant Left-winger Harry Cohen said: 'When MPs were given this allowance they were told "Go and spend it, boys" and that is what I have done. It is my right.'

A real quote? or a paraphrase by the Mail?
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 29, 2009, 09:24:14 AM
He is arrogant enough for it to be accurate  cussing:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Uncle Mort on March 29, 2009, 09:26:00 AM
 cussing:

AS soon as someone says "it's my right"  Angry9:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 29, 2009, 12:43:52 PM
This guy needs stringing up too  cussing:

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165337/We-told-Go-spend-boys-says-MP-claimed-310-000-holiday-home.html (http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1165337/We-told-Go-spend-boys-says-MP-claimed-310-000-holiday-home.html)

I've just signed up for that petition leaving a comment in my own subtle style. If I suddenly vanish then you will know that the mail presented the petition a couple of days previously.  whistle:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 29, 2009, 02:07:06 PM
I see Jacki's husband has been caught downloading porn films at public expense  whistle:


 point: point: point: point: point:

But! BUT! BUT! She says she has now paid back the £10 cost of the films viewed and her housemousehusband has been forced out of the house to make a public apology to the assembled press corps.


We are generous people here ~ surely we can understand how such a "mistake" came to be made and we all know how hard it is to (i) live without the wife at home without getting into trouble by watching porn (ii) how desirable Jackboot is and that porn is no substitute for a good wife and lastly (iii) how to say no to a wife who demands our obedience. ~ Like FUCK I do  eveilgrin: but I know many who do.
Title: The joy of the embarrasment
Post by: GROWLER on March 29, 2009, 08:31:34 PM
Seems our beloved Jaqui is a smutty little bitch then...oh sorry, it's her husbands fault.  ::)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7970731.stm

Beggars belief. noooo:
Title: Re: The joy of the embarrasment
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 29, 2009, 08:40:05 PM
The 'lads' are discussing this in t'other thread entitled - Good Lord Noooooo or something like that

P.S not pointing this out in a pedantic or sarky manner- I know you're had a bad enough day  - just trying to be helpful for once in me life !!!!
Title: Re: The joy of the embarrasment
Post by: GROWLER on March 29, 2009, 08:54:41 PM
The 'lads' are discussing this in t'other thread entitled - Good Lord Noooooo or something like that

P.S not pointing this out in a pedantic or sarky manner- I know you're had a bad enough day  - just trying to be helpful for once in me life !!!!

Oh. I hadn't read that.  redface:

Thanks for politely pointing that out MD. The others would have been a tad more brutal.

Feel free to delete this thread then Snoops. ;)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 29, 2009, 10:34:19 PM
I can't help wondering how the story about Jaqccuse's husband actually broke. Did someone spot a golden opportunity during a routine FOI request or was it leaked?


Personally my money is on Deep Throat whistle:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 30, 2009, 11:04:29 AM
 lol:


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPqAep4S.jpg&hash=5dc9f3fd0b4d66aabaec12f01c71aca0590cc5d1) (http://www.postimage.org/)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 11:48:38 AM
Great HYS comment on the BBC website.  lol:

Quote
What is the subliminal message here? Free porn = safer neighbourhoods?

I may just vote Labour for the first time! Jacqui Smith and her man are visionaries.

The Screeching Weasel, Airdrie
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 30, 2009, 01:30:26 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/5071069/Husband-and-wife-MPs-build-up-250000-nest-egg-on-taxpayer.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/5071069/Husband-and-wife-MPs-build-up-250000-nest-egg-on-taxpayer.html)

One every day. The newspapers are getting their files out!
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 01:36:58 PM
Why else would anyone want to be a Labour MP? shrugs:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 01:40:22 PM
There has to be an exception to the rule though hound. What about Dennis Skinner?
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 30, 2009, 01:41:45 PM
He was a firebrand but is well past his sell by date. His pension is massive and safeguarded and he knows it
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 01:47:34 PM
To be honest I quite like Skinner so I don't begrudge him his pension. As for the rest of them:

Labour = Living Assisted By Outrageous Undeserved Rewards.  cussing:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 01:47:56 PM
There has to be an exception to the rule though hound. What about Dennis Skinner?

One of the very few in the house who is at least honest but even he has had his card marked on occasions by the press.
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Pastis on March 30, 2009, 04:55:33 PM
The thing that I find gruesomely ironic about the Jacqui Smith expenses claim is that she's the one taking the moral high ground on prostitution and porn while hubby is at home, 2nd home that is  ::) , availing himself of it ... (Euphemism #269)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 05:02:21 PM
Looks Like Jaqccuse may not be much longer for the political world. Gordon gave his equivalent of a 'full support of the board' speech and said that claiming expenses for adult films should be a "personal matter".

What do you reckon folks? I'm estimating 2 weeks or one more embarrassing story.


And back on topic for a brief moment, not only has ballsup declared he would like No 11, his equally useless and moronic grasping harridan of a wife wants the No 10. job.  eeek:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 30, 2009, 05:03:17 PM
To be honest I quite like Skinner so I don't begrudge him his pension. As for the rest of them:

Labour = Living Assisted By Outrageous Undeserved Rewards.  cussing:

It's not just Labour MP's though is it ...lets face it in terms of expense claims they are all as bad as one another  noooo:

Time to just stop the gravy train for everyone and start again. Wonder how many would be interested in becoming or remaining an MP then ?
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 05:06:33 PM
The thing that I find gruesomely ironic about the Jacqui Smith expenses claim is that she's the one taking the moral high ground on prostitution and porn while hubby is at home, 2nd home that is  ::) , availing himself of it ... (Euphemism #269)

But having seen her ~ what would be your choice? Shag that or watch a porn movie and make love to the five fingered widow.

No contest ~ even Blunkett would turn her down  8)

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.mirror.co.uk%2Fupl%2Fsm3%2Fjan2008%2F0%2F7%2FBABD1933-BDB6-E4A0-4159D39CA0D6FA84.jpg&hash=3a4241feec36cfb284d8965a59fb47f4230dc1d2)
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Nick on March 30, 2009, 05:18:16 PM
I have called Jacqui's husband and offered cut price Kleenex whistle:. Anyone want his number? eveilgrin:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 05:29:22 PM
Isn't she a bloody mess ~ and we wonder why the ordinary populace look so awful.
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 05:32:07 PM
I'm guessing her husband is a fan of the 'lights off & blindfolded" approach.  whistle:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 05:33:17 PM
S&M taken to extremes if you ask me ~ which I appreciate you didn't.
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 05:35:36 PM
extreme S&M would be with the lights on and no blindfold Snoop.  sick2:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 05:53:11 PM
Methinks the voice of experience should be heeded by we mere amateurs in these matters  worthy:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 30, 2009, 05:54:42 PM
Experience in S&M? None, common sense plenty. The idea of having to look Jaqccuse in the face whilst doing the deed would have to be the stuff of nightmares.  scared2:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 30, 2009, 05:56:57 PM
 noooo: noooo: noooo:

Lets face it if he was married to a goddess he would still be watching porn   whistle:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 06:00:02 PM
 noooo: It doesn't work that way.
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 30, 2009, 06:03:37 PM
noooo: It doesn't work that way.

What they would be watching it together  lol:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Snoopy on March 30, 2009, 06:15:26 PM
noooo: It doesn't work that way.

What they would be watching it together  lol:

A good wife should share her husbands hobbies  lol:
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 02, 2009, 09:17:52 AM
http://www.order-order.com/2009/04/pornographers-exploiting-jacqui/

 happy001 happy001 happy001
Title: Re: For the love of God, NOOOO!!!!!
Post by: Grumpmeister on April 02, 2009, 05:15:29 PM
The Playboy Jacqui Smith VIP package????  eeek: eeek: eeek:




Not an image any same man would want in their head  sick2: