The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => Saloon Bar => Topic started by: Berek on April 02, 2008, 10:19:24 AM

Title: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Berek on April 02, 2008, 10:19:24 AM
well well well

chances of her returning home are practically zero now like
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 02, 2008, 10:28:34 AM
Indeed. Once Social Services get their teeth into you you may as well emigrate ( evil:)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 02, 2008, 10:37:40 AM
That was always on the cards now wasn't it?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 02, 2008, 10:42:40 AM
Agreed. I was about to write "What a family..." but it strains the definition of the word "family"
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Berek on April 02, 2008, 10:49:24 AM
I want that one..

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hen-den.co.uk%2Fcatalog%2Fimages%2Flittle-britain-costume-andy.jpg&hash=a1e64868cd47a715e113ba6ae68fd4d291e9bb64)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 02, 2008, 10:52:22 AM
Granny?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 02, 2008, 01:28:22 PM
As much as he annoys me, Dippy at the "other Place" wrote :-

"My heart goes out to the poor mother, not only unable to wrap her princess in the loving embrace of the family home, but that the man she trusted, with whom she shared her bed, her benefits, and her needles, may have so cruelly betrayed her.

She should unburden herself to a trusted and sympathetic listener, perhaps through a Sunday newsapaper, learn the lessons, focus on the future, and move on."


Which I found quite funny, and sadly true
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 02, 2008, 01:30:17 PM
Social services may get involved.Or they may not evil:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Landlady on April 03, 2008, 07:08:39 AM
They (Mother and SF) both make me totally sick and I would not shed one single tear if something nasty happened to them  cussing:

I do not (can not, will not) believe that 'M' did not know that scanky SF was abusing the child - normal mothers would single handedly tear the still beating heart out of anyone they seriously suspected to hurting any of their children

We can only hope now that the poor child gets the proper help she needs and that perhaps she will be lucky enough to find a good adoption home.

Can't write anymore without probably exploding !!!!  Angry9:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 03, 2008, 07:18:20 AM
In the interests of balance should we not wait until we know the facts?

At the moment all we know is that the child disappeared and was found with a relative of her step father and that, in the course of their investigations the police believe that they have found evidence (presumably on a PC) that the step father likes looking at mucky pictures of people who may be young enough to be classified as children. It does not follow that he has in anyway interfered with the child. Looking at the mother I would expect him to need some stimulus to be able to get it up at all.

Yes I grant that the police have been questioning the child for a long time now and she may well have told them that the step father was molesting her but equally she may not. Evidence first, then verdict and sentence is all I am saying.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Landlady on April 03, 2008, 07:32:28 AM
Point taken Snoopy - and I truly hope that you are proven correct in your assumption that he is just a nasty perve who oggles kiddie porn and nothing more and she is just a average now neglectful mother.

My outcry however that I would tear anyone limb from limb if I felt enough proof was there that they had molested my child, or any child for that matter still stand I'm afraid.............
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 03, 2008, 07:34:00 AM
With you all the way actually.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 03, 2008, 12:23:03 PM
What Snoopy said was well contructed, logical and paid full attention to the facts at hand.

I,however, come from the Lynch Mob school of thought, so I say just take him outside and gently shoot him in the back of the head.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Landlady on April 03, 2008, 04:55:09 PM

I say just take him outside and gently shoot him in the back of the head.


If he is guilty, even a little little bit - then thats still tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo good for the barsteward  cussing:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 03, 2008, 05:00:25 PM
In the interests of balance should we not wait until we know the facts?

At the moment all we know is that the child disappeared and was found with a relative of her step father and that, in the course of their investigations the police believe that they have found evidence (presumably on a PC) that the step father likes looking at mucky pictures of people who may be young enough to be classified as children. It does not follow that he has in anyway interfered with the child. Looking at the mother I would expect him to need some stimulus to be able to get it up at all.

Yes I grant that the police have been questioning the child for a long time now and she may well have told them that the step father was molesting her but equally she may not. Evidence first, then verdict and sentence is all I am saying.
You are Uncle Mort... I claim my £5.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 03, 2008, 05:00:44 PM
What Snoopy said was well contructed, logical and paid full attention to the facts at hand.

I,however, come from the Lynch Mob school of thought, so I say just take him outside and gently shoot him in the back of the head.

Hang him!  cussing:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 03, 2008, 05:01:30 PM
Just trying to keep a little order in the house BM. whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 03, 2008, 05:01:59 PM
Just trying to keep a little order in the house BM. whistle:
Good boy... where is Uncle today?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 03, 2008, 05:02:25 PM
 shrugs:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 03, 2008, 07:42:58 PM
Been out for the day with the sprogs, it being half term I've taken a few days off.

I see Snoopy has been deputising for me and doing a good job. As much I abhor this family  and their 'values' everyone is entitled to the due process of the law and are innocent etc, etc.

However I wouldn't bet on his being innocent.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 04, 2008, 04:48:41 AM
It seems unlikely...  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 04, 2008, 07:37:45 AM
Been out for the day with the sprogs, it being half term I've taken a few days off.

I see Snoopy has been deputising for me and doing a good job. As much I abhor this family  and their 'values' everyone is entitled to the due process of the law and are innocent etc, etc.

However I wouldn't bet on his being innocent.

It's a tough job but somebody etc.

Yes he probably is guilty as hell .... the Social Services certainly give the appearence of thinking he is.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 04, 2008, 07:44:26 AM
Been out for the day with the sprogs, it being half term I've taken a few days off.

I see Snoopy has been deputising for me and doing a good job. As much I abhor this family  and their 'values' everyone is entitled to the due process of the law and are innocent etc, etc.

However I wouldn't bet on his being innocent.

It's a tough job but somebody etc.

Yes he probably is guilty as hell .... the Social Services certainly give the appearence of thinking he is.
Stop wasting money on all this "course of justice" business, just string him up.

He's only a Northern Monkey after all, so there are plenty more of them if it was a mistake.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 04, 2008, 12:16:13 PM
Been out for the day with the sprogs, it being half term I've taken a few days off.

I see Snoopy has been deputising for me and doing a good job. As much I abhor this family  and their 'values' everyone is entitled to the due process of the law and are innocent etc, etc.

However I wouldn't bet on his being innocent.

It's a tough job but somebody etc.

Yes he probably is guilty as hell .... the Social Services certainly give the appearence of thinking he is.
Stop wasting money on all this "course of justice" business, just string him up.

He's only a Northern Monkey after all, so there are plenty more of them if it was a mistake.
Agreed…  cussing:

Hang him, now and if necessary ask questions later – his inevitable silence will be even more proof of his guilt…  whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Just One More on April 04, 2008, 12:33:23 PM
Don't go mixing those Tykes up with us Northern monkeys.... and yes, hang him
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 04, 2008, 12:59:36 PM
Stepfather remanded over images  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7327883.stm)


Quote
The bespectacled stepfather wore a black Manchester United shirt with the name Ronaldo on the back and spoke only to confirm his name, address and age.


He's guilty for sure.  eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 04, 2008, 01:01:07 PM
 rubschin:  Ronaldo for peados, Rooney for Granny shaggers it is then.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 04, 2008, 01:36:39 PM
Stepfather remanded over images  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7327883.stm)


Quote
The bespectacled stepfather wore a black Manchester United shirt with the name Ronaldo on the back and spoke only to confirm his name, address and age.


He's guilty for sure.  eeek:

I'm still not sure.

In the photo he is not wearing the proper metal rimmed glasses that all nonces wear.  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 04, 2008, 02:36:15 PM
Stepfather remanded over images  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7327883.stm)


Quote
The bespectacled stepfather wore a black Manchester United shirt with the name Ronaldo on the back and spoke only to confirm his name, address and age.


He's guilty for sure.  eeek:

I'm still not sure.

In the photo he is not wearing the proper metal rimmed glasses that all nonces wear.  noooo:

I reckon nonce-o-specs are too well known now… he nipped down to specsavers before abducting the kid… prolly…   whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 04, 2008, 03:40:14 PM
And now this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7331107.stm

Beware of strangers my arse!
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 04, 2008, 04:03:44 PM
And now this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7331107.stm

Beware of strangers my arse!
I Don’t know why but there is something doubly awful about the thought of women being involved in such a thing…  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 04, 2008, 04:16:29 PM
OK Let us twist the scenario ~ suppose that the child was considered by her Mother, Auntie, Grannie to be at risk from the Step Father or that the Mother, perhaps knowing of the Step Father's liking for kiddie porn, thought that it was time to hoof him out and has discussed the how and why of this with her rellies .... so they hatch a plot to frighten him by spiriting her away and hiding her with an Uncle where they feel she will be safe and they can pop in and out to make sure all is well. Then they report her missing (it took them some time to do this remember) and sit back and let the hue and cry put the skids under the Step Father who they wanted to "get".
So far there has been no evidence or even suggestion that she has been harmed or molested ~ in fact those neighbours that were interviewed after having seen her being taken away by a police officer from the flat where she was "found" all said she looked happy and relaxed about the whole thing ..... hardly the way one would expect a child who had been in the hands of a peado for several weeks to be described.
There is so much in this and the more that comes out the less certain I am that it is/was a simple abduction for sexual purposes.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 05, 2008, 03:06:10 PM
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 05, 2008, 03:31:25 PM
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 05, 2008, 03:48:46 PM
And charge the cost of the bullets to whatever estate they may have.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 05, 2008, 03:51:07 PM
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:

Judging by the size of most of the family they weould need a fleet of JCBS noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 05, 2008, 04:18:03 PM
I would like to add to my previous comment - take the entire family, any relatives and all friends/associates outside.

And shoot them all gently in the back of the head.
Force them to dig their own mass grave first too...  whistle:

Judging by the size of most of the family they weould need a fleet of JCBS noooo:
noooo:
...using only their bare fingers...
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 07, 2008, 07:28:34 AM
So now the mother has been arrested.

I heard on the news that she is 32!

I would have put her nearer 50 by the look of her noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: GROWLER on April 07, 2008, 07:43:08 AM
So now the mother has been arrested.

I heard on the news that she is 32!

I would have put her nearer 50 by the look of her noooo:

Staggerin' isn't it? Must only be the brother/sister/whoever, there's that many of them, left to be questioned now.

I know you shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, but this one had "The encyclopedia of Hammer House of Horrors' written all over it the first time I clapped eyes on that mother and her 'flock'.....32 my arse!  happy001

Isn't that the number of different fathers her kids have got? rubschin:

Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 07, 2008, 07:47:05 AM
I just tried to post a pic of the mother. It crashed my computer! eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 07, 2008, 07:53:45 AM
Here you go:


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPq1zsHuJ.jpg&hash=cd4f493fdd86f99754fc9b3a0b471a093280355d) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1zsHuJ)

32...   eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: GROWLER on April 07, 2008, 07:54:47 AM
Here you go:


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPq1zsHuJ.jpg&hash=cd4f493fdd86f99754fc9b3a0b471a093280355d) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1zsHuJ)

32...   eeek:



Corrrrr! cloud9:












Appointment at specsavers @11....meow!
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 07, 2008, 08:36:46 AM
Blimey big G ~ I know you're after a dog but there are limits mate.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: chuntering again on April 07, 2008, 12:50:25 PM
I agree with Snoopy. Repellent as the Matthews are, they are entitled to due process of the law and not to be tried in absentia by the gutter press. That said, it's a riveting soap opera and I can't wait to read the next "revelation".
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 07, 2008, 12:55:30 PM
The full story will be very interesting, although I'm losing track of who's who.

A family tree would useful.  eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 07, 2008, 01:08:08 PM
I was having the same problem. rubschin:

Bit like this perhaps?


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPq1AJZ_r.jpg&hash=59a061dc932b3560dec890f1ebca2d3c41d2edc4) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1AJZ_r)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 07, 2008, 01:40:48 PM
I would like to add to my previous comments. Take the entire population of Dewsbury outside and shoot them all gently in the back of the head.

And then Napalm it.

Please.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 07, 2008, 01:43:22 PM
The BBC website headline is 
Quote
Mother arrested by Shannon police


So now the Irish are getting involved! rubschin:
 
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 07, 2008, 01:45:35 PM
Doncha just lurve the BBC?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 07, 2008, 02:23:53 PM
Hang them!  cussing:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 07, 2008, 02:28:34 PM
Hang them!  cussing:

Wot ~ the BBC?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 07, 2008, 02:42:21 PM
Hang them!  cussing:

Wot ~ the BBC?
Um, nooooooooooo...  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 07, 2008, 05:30:40 PM
I would like to add to my previous comments. Take the entire population of Dewsbury outside and shoot them all gently in the back of the head.

And then Napalm it.

Please.

I have to say that is the quickest, easiest and cheapest solution.

It gets my vote
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: The Moan Ranger on April 07, 2008, 05:46:30 PM
DS has always been an extremely perceptive chap. It is good to know they are still around.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 07, 2008, 05:48:59 PM
Where is Dewsbury anyway?Is it nice?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 07, 2008, 05:51:33 PM
Where is Dewsbury anyway?Is it nice?

Not far from t'centre of Leeds
They have a website ... it looks nice enough place, if tha like t'Yorkshire
http://www.batleyanddewsbury.co.uk/
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 07, 2008, 07:44:57 PM
It does look a nice place. So how comes it can spawn such unpleasant inhabitants?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 07, 2008, 07:48:17 PM
It's virtually in Leeds ~ would be a good place to start your research into that question.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 09:31:29 AM
Not that I am one to say "Told you so" but..............

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3701834.ece
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 09:40:16 AM
And it gets better ~ but is this speculation or do we now have the motive?

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2008/04/08/cops-probe-madeleine-mccann-cash-link-to-shannon-matthews-case-86908-20376430/
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 08, 2008, 10:09:17 AM
And it gets better ~ but is this speculation or do we now have the motive?

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2008/04/08/cops-probe-madeleine-mccann-cash-link-to-shannon-matthews-case-86908-20376430/

Interesting.
I did remark to Mrs DS (#3) a few months ago when the Maddie thing was flavour-of-the-week, that it wouldn't be long before some opportunist scrounger set out to bump off their own kiddy and start a cash fund.

I didn't know about the "Shameless" programme of course, as it isn't on the BBC.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: chuntering again on April 08, 2008, 03:06:13 PM
Not that I am one to say "Told you so" but..............

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3701834.ece

Come on Snoopy, on page 3 you were lecturing the forum about "due process of law", now you're telling us that "you told us so" based on the latest rumour from "A Source".
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 03:13:19 PM
Not that I am one to say "Told you so" but..............

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3701834.ece

Come on Snoopy, on page 3 you were lecturing the forum about "due process of law", now you're telling us that "you told us so" based on the latest rumour from "A Source".

I said, on page 3
Quote
OK Let us twist the scenario ~ suppose that the child was considered by her Mother, Auntie, Grannie to be at risk from the Step Father or that the Mother, perhaps knowing of the Step Father's liking for kiddie porn, thought that it was time to hoof him out and has discussed the how and why of this with her rellies .... so they hatch a plot to frighten him by spiriting her away and hiding her with an Uncle where they feel she will be safe and they can pop in and out to make sure all is well. Then they report her missing (it took them some time to do this remember) and sit back and let the hue and cry put the skids under the Step Father who they wanted to "get".
So far there has been no evidence or even suggestion that she has been harmed or molested ~ in fact those neighbours that were interviewed after having seen her being taken away by a police officer from the flat where she was "found" all said she looked happy and relaxed about the whole thing ..... hardly the way one would expect a child who had been in the hands of a peado for several weeks to be described.
There is so much in this and the more that comes out the less certain I am that it is/was a simple abduction for sexual purposes.

Which says that there was a motive for the immediate family to be involved which would explain the inconsistancies that the "peado" motive did not. It seems that the plod think so too.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: chuntering again on April 08, 2008, 03:20:26 PM
Sorry I mean page 1, I couldn't be arsed to rake through the thread to find the page number, and assumed you wouldn't retort with pedantry.  bom

Quote
In the interests of balance should we not wait until we know the facts?

The facts according to "A source" and Times online.   lol:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 03:23:04 PM
Pedantry is my middle name  evil:

The Police have now asked for a further 24 hours in which to question Shannon's mother and there is a story circulating that suggests members of her family had been approaching the McCanns for "financial assistance" to help find the little girl since they are loaded like and nobody had put up tons of money to help poor Shannon's Mum. whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 08, 2008, 03:26:27 PM
If the motive for the kidnap was some perverse inter-family kiddie fiddling scheme they should all be hanged immediately.

If the motive was financial as appears to be the case that would be quite a different matter… The sick bastards should all be hanged immediately.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 03:28:08 PM
 lol: lol: lol:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 08, 2008, 03:34:17 PM
If the pikeys do burn my desk down tonight can we hang them as well please?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 03:35:51 PM
Of course  happy100
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 08, 2008, 03:36:49 PM
Of course  happy100

Good man.  happy088
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 08, 2008, 03:39:56 PM
If the pikeys do burn my desk down tonight can we hang them as well please?
Yes... we'll do a job-lot...  ;)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 08, 2008, 03:40:59 PM
Prolly cheaper by the dozen anyway .... or does it have to be in tens these days?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 08, 2008, 03:43:41 PM
Prolly cheaper by the dozen anyway .... or does it have to be in tens these days?

Metric pikeys?  rubschin:

Fvck it. hang em anyway.  ;)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 08, 2008, 03:43:54 PM
We’ll offer a discount for ten… politicians go free…  whistle:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 08, 2008, 03:45:24 PM
We’ll offer a discount for ten… politicians go free…  whistle:

Pikey politicians?  eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 08, 2008, 04:02:16 PM
We’ll offer a discount for ten… politicians go free…  whistle:

Pikey politicians?  eeek:
Um... yes TG....








 whacky115
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Berek on April 08, 2008, 07:41:54 PM
mother facing 2 charges, CPS have just announced it like
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: GROWLER on April 08, 2008, 09:39:27 PM
mother facing 2 charges, CPS have just announced it like

Karen Matthews, 32, will appear before magistrates in Dewsbury charged with perverting the course of justice and child neglect.


Looks like all our assumptions are coming home to roost...or summat like that. confused:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 09, 2008, 08:03:32 AM
Indeed.
Looks like a scam to get money out of the McCanns or anybody else.
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 09, 2008, 09:43:41 AM
Hanging really would be too good for them...  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 09, 2008, 09:44:07 AM
Gentle shooting?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 09, 2008, 09:44:51 AM
Gentle shooting?
Too gentle...  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 09, 2008, 09:46:30 AM
Let them fight it out and charge admission then?
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 09, 2008, 09:47:33 AM
Let them fight it out and charge admission then?
I was thinking more along the lines of removing their skin and rolling them in salt… until dead… I suppose you could charge admission.  rubschin:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Berek on April 09, 2008, 10:17:51 AM
Now she has been charged with child neglect I trust the McCanns will face a similar thing like
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Nick on April 09, 2008, 10:18:34 AM
Of course they will





























 happy001 happy001 happy001 happy001
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: GROWLER on April 09, 2008, 02:53:26 PM
The perverting the course of justice charge alleges she "repeatedly concealed information in relation to the whereabouts of Shannon Matthews in interviews and other contacts with officers with the West Yorkshire Police and claimed to have no knowledge of her whereabouts."

Banged up now, and rightly so too. cussing:

Without wishing to condem her before the trial, it really does appear to have been a money making scam this
Second thoughts, NO!
She's guilty, bloody heathen.
Throw away the key. happy088


Bloody good actress though. Remember those initial interviews outside her house, floods of tears and wailing at the camera, then so so upset she had to turn away...theatrical drug laden munter. cussing:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 09, 2008, 02:56:43 PM
She has now ousted pegleg as the most despised person in the UK i'm sure.

Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 10, 2008, 07:47:28 AM
She has now ousted pegleg as the most despised person in the UK i'm sure.


Indeed... they had to board the house up...  noooo:

No doubt the whole odious family will be given new identities and a new home when they are released ion a few months. Mind you, that ‘husband’ will need extensive plastic surgery…  Banghead
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Just One More on April 10, 2008, 07:53:39 AM
She has now ousted pegleg as the most despised person in the UK i'm sure.


Indeed... they had to board the house up...  noooo:

No doubt the whole odious family will be given new identities and a new home when they are released ion a few months. Mind you, that ‘husband’ will need extensive plastic surgery…  Banghead

I'm sure that they'll both come out of prison/remand with their faces rearranged free of charge
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 10, 2008, 07:56:57 AM
She has now ousted pegleg as the most despised person in the UK i'm sure.


Indeed... they had to board the house up...  noooo:

No doubt the whole odious family will be given new identities and a new home when they are released ion a few months. Mind you, that ‘husband’ will need extensive plastic surgery…  Banghead

I'm sure that they'll both come out of prison/remand with their faces rearranged free of charge
If only that were the case we’d all feel more comfortable about it… However, I suspect they will be separated from the rest of the prison population for their own safety while inside…   noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: GROWLER on April 10, 2008, 12:44:02 PM
Three women are being questioned over the disappearance of Shannon Matthews.
West Yorkshire Police are speaking to Amanda Hyett, 25, her sister Caroline Meehan and her mother Alice Meehan, 49.
The women have been arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice by police investigating the disappearance of Shannon Matthews, the force confirmed.


Sorry. I'm fast losing the plot here. Who are these people, and haven't they already been arrested? rubschin:
I'm totally baffled in this complete spiders web now.  confused:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 10, 2008, 12:49:06 PM
They all look so brain-dead…

If it really was an attempt to screw funds out of the ‘find maddie’ fund I’d have to suggest that it was in fact Shannon that masterminded the whole thing…  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 11, 2008, 02:20:09 PM

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV1tf2J0.jpg&hash=c09a409125c8fc8eb242745833494754e604d098) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1tf2J0)


 eeek:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: TG on April 11, 2008, 02:21:33 PM

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV1tf2J0.jpg&hash=c09a409125c8fc8eb242745833494754e604d098) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1tf2J0)


 eeek:


Cheers for that Unc.  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Snoopy on April 11, 2008, 02:22:01 PM
 eeek: Indeed
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 11, 2008, 02:35:06 PM
Such a tender moment needed to be shared.  sick2:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Barman on April 11, 2008, 02:37:25 PM
Such a tender moment needed to be shared.  sick2:
They could've just slipped the noose round both their necks... what a wasted opportunity...  noooo:
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Uncle Mort on April 16, 2008, 04:05:32 PM
Not as complicated as I expected  ::)


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV298Vdr.jpg&hash=f4c07123b923ced37ba65a1737a13c4df350763c) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV298Vdr)
Title: Re: Shannons stepdad questioned on child porn
Post by: Darwins Selection on April 16, 2008, 04:27:45 PM
Not as complicated as I expected  ::)


(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV298Vdr.jpg&hash=f4c07123b923ced37ba65a1737a13c4df350763c) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV298Vdr)


They seem quite a normal, caring nuclear family enjoying normal life in 21st century England.



Thinks, 'nuclear' gives me an idea. . .  rubschin: