Post by: apc2010 on March 22, 2016, 08:39:26 AM
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 08:48:22 AM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 09:53:20 AM
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 09:56:14 AM
Back tomorrow. noooo:
they say tighter security at Gatwick (for some reason the other airports not mentioned)....
What do you expect...?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 10:02:15 AM
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 10:03:27 AM
Security is tight at Gatwick anyway, but I would expect to see lots more cops with guns in the check-in areas. They are the unsafest areas as passengers haven't gone through any security scanning at that point.
Not that I am pointing the finger, but do you have any members of The Religion Of Pieces working air-side...?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 10:12:45 AM
Security is tight at Gatwick anyway, but I would expect to see lots more cops with guns in the check-in areas. They are the unsafest areas as passengers haven't gone through any security scanning at that point.
Not that I am pointing the finger, but do you have any members of The Religion Of Pieces working air-side...?
Loads noooo: Nowhere near as many as Heathrow though.
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 10:30:56 AM
Security is tight at Gatwick anyway, but I would expect to see lots more cops with guns in the check-in areas. They are the unsafest areas as passengers haven't gone through any security scanning at that point.
Not that I am pointing the finger, but do you have any members of The Religion Of Pieces working air-side...?
Loads noooo: Nowhere near as many as Heathrow though.
That is what I thought.... noooo:
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 10:32:20 AM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 10:51:14 AM
Post by: Steve on March 22, 2016, 11:49:17 AM
I work in probably the safest area. If we assume that the rag-heads want to inflict maximum casualties, they will either set bombs to go off in the most crowded areas - check-in and the plane itself. If they did develop a bomb invisible to the various scanners to get on a plane, it would be set to detonate when the plane is in the air - long after it has passed under our boots. They want a bigger prize than a few lowly baggage handlers.
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 12:44:06 PM
I work in probably the safest area. If we assume that the rag-heads want to inflict maximum casualties, they will either set bombs to go off in the most crowded areas - check-in and the plane itself. If they did develop a bomb invisible to the various scanners to get on a plane, it would be set to detonate when the plane is in the air - long after it has passed under our boots. They want a bigger prize than a few lowly baggage handlers.
Don't stamp so hard from now on.... noooo:
Post by: Darwins Selection on March 22, 2016, 01:24:29 PM
I work in probably the safest area. If we assume that the rag-heads want to inflict maximum casualties, they will either set bombs to go off in the most crowded areas - check-in and the plane itself. If they did develop a bomb invisible to the various scanners to get on a plane, it would be set to detonate when the plane is in the air - long after it has passed under our boots. They want a bigger prize than a few lowly baggage handlers.
Don't stamp so hard from now on.... noooo:
The boots of tip-toeing. scared2:
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 01:26:25 PM
I work in probably the safest area. If we assume that the rag-heads want to inflict maximum casualties, they will either set bombs to go off in the most crowded areas - check-in and the plane itself. If they did develop a bomb invisible to the various scanners to get on a plane, it would be set to detonate when the plane is in the air - long after it has passed under our boots. They want a bigger prize than a few lowly baggage handlers.
Don't stamp so hard from now on.... noooo:
The boots of tip-toeing. scared2:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 01:33:39 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on March 22, 2016, 02:24:33 PM
That will never happen
:thumbsup:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F41n4wsMIaPL._SL500_SY260_BO1%2C204%2C203%2C200_.jpg&hash=245830d16225692ddc0a4f21c8c46dde6d95abef)
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 02:34:43 PM
That will never happen
:thumbsup:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F41n4wsMIaPL._SL500_SY260_BO1%2C204%2C203%2C200_.jpg&hash=245830d16225692ddc0a4f21c8c46dde6d95abef)
lol: lol: lol:
I loved Bill Tidy.... cloud9:
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 02:40:57 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on March 22, 2016, 02:48:25 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on March 22, 2016, 02:53:10 PM
Way before my time...
Like so many good things........
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 02:54:10 PM
rubschin:
rubschin:
Valerie Singleton and Pip Hinton?
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 02:56:56 PM
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 02:57:54 PM
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 03:00:24 PM
Oh...................
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 03:04:48 PM
http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks (http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks)
Oh...................
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! sad32:
Post by: Steve on March 22, 2016, 03:07:00 PM
http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks (http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks)Well to be fair she is 77 now
Oh...................
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 03:08:08 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs29.postimg.org%2Fgzkw9m7yb%2FMoan.jpg&hash=e84e6166ef2ebb958b477703246d19bbf79afb46) (http://postimg.org/image/gzkw9m7yb/)
Post by: Nick on March 22, 2016, 03:08:23 PM
69 would have been preferable at one time noooo:http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks (http://www.acicommission.org.uk/susan-stranks)Well to be fair she is 77 now
Oh...................
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 22, 2016, 03:33:07 PM
Way before my time...
You and me both moanio
Post by: beerhead on March 22, 2016, 05:20:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N66QfotPcfA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N66QfotPcfA)
Post by: Barman on March 22, 2016, 05:25:02 PM
Baggage Handlers Theme Song ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N66QfotPcfA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N66QfotPcfA)
Oh, I don't think they bother picking it up first.... noooo:
Post by: Barman on March 24, 2016, 06:57:02 AM
Well, for me anyway.... cloud9:
Quote from: Raheem Kassam
Teddy bears, tears, candles, cartoons, murals, mosaics, flowers, flags, projections, hashtags, balloons, wreaths, lights, vigils, scarves, and more. These are the best solutions the Western world seems to come up with every few months when we are slammed by another Islamist terrorist attack. We are our own sickness.
Do go and read it all! Thumbs:
Post by: Steve on March 24, 2016, 08:55:03 AM
There are no easy solutions to complex problems but there are dumb approaches and being the recruiting sergeant for terrorism is one of those. You defeat terrorism by separating socially and physically the good from the bad not by driving them together and turning off our best source of intel - informants.