The Virtual Pub
Come Inside... => The Commons => Topic started by: Barman on December 01, 2013, 02:30:36 PM
-
Read this and pass it on - it is disgusting....
A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.
Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.
The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.
The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.
Clicky... (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10486452/Child-taken-from-womb-by-social-services.html)
I'm speechless... noooo:
Fortunately, others are not...
I am incandescent with rage. The state is the most vile, evil organisation imaginable. The state is not your friend, it is your worst enemy. That our state can operate secret courts that will forcibly take a child from its mother’s womb tells us all we need to know about this wicked monstrosity. The court of protection needs disbanding now. All justice needs to be transparent for secret justice is not justice at all, it is the machinery of the police state.
There are no words in the English language to adequately describe just how evil these people are or how much I despise them.
Scum, the lot of them. Evil, spiteful, execrable, pernicious scum, every single one of them.
Clicky.... (http://www.longrider.co.uk/blog/2013/12/01/shouting-from-the-rooftops/)
As usual, these draconian actions were carried out in secret almost 15-months ago, supported by the UK’s much maligned Court of Protection. The unbelieveable behaviour of Essex social working scum has only been revealed due to the parliamentary privilege of John Hemming MP, one of the few parliamentarians that seems prepared to stand-up for families caught in the judicial nightmare of dealing with the UK’s predatory social workers and the Court of Protection.
Year in, year out, we read of social workers behaving in a manner that would shame the Gestapo and yet despite all of the bland mutterings about “Children being our primary concern” or “The council cannot comment on individual cases”, such abominations continue.
The Court of Protection needs to be either stripped of it’s power to hush-up such matters or disbanded entirely. This sort of reprehensible behaviour by social workers will continue until we remove the veils of secrecy behind which they hide. The only way to stop such abuses is to shine the light of the media in the dark recesses and throw social workers in jail.
Clicky... (http://www.countingcats.com/?p=15601)
noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo: noooo:
-
Don't get me started on fvcking social workers cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing:
-
Been discussing this elsewhere just today. It's the all power and no scrutiny of these decisions that appalls me. Bound to lead to appalling results whether this case is or is not such
Apparently the Lib Dems John Hemming is going to raise this in the House of Commons this week which should be interesting as he can ask what the hell he likes there. Unlikely to be PMQs though
A space to watch: http://johnhemming.blogspot.co.uk/ (http://johnhemming.blogspot.co.uk/)
-
Civil words fail me. cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing:
-
I see there have been more movements in this case
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-25193084 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-25193084)"Historically, the mother has two other children, who she is unable to care for due to orders made by the Italian authorities," the council said,
http://johnhemming.blogspot.co.uk/ (http://johnhemming.blogspot.co.uk/)Essex County Council's failure to follow international law
Under the Vienna convention article 36 and also under Brussels II Bis revised (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003) articles 15, 55 and 56 the Italian authorities should have been contacted about both the mother’s imprisonment and the care of the baby. However, they were not.
In 2011 Essex (in response to an FOI request) said they had no contact with High Commissions and Embassies. In 2010-11 they had 21 children who were foreign nationals who had become "looked after". This was as part of 138 who had become "looked after" in the previous 5 years. It is clear, therefore, that they were not following international law then and have not followed international law in this case."
rubschin: