0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The US publisher of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is taking legal action against two companies for dispatching copies of the book early. Scholastic sued online retailer DeepDiscount.com for breaking the strict embargo of 21 July. In court papers filed in Illinois, the publisher also named its distributor Levy Entertainment for failing to ensure books were not sent out. It said only a tiny fraction of its 12 million copies had been distributed. "The number of copies shipped is around one one-hundredth of one per cent," said Scholastic in a statement. 'Please ignore' The company added that they had a list of customers who had ordered the book from DeepDiscount.com and were asking them to put it to one side if they have already received it by mistake. A report in The Baltimore Sun newspaper about a customer who had already received his copy prompted Scholastic to take action. Scholastic is seeking unspecified damages from the two companies for "complete and flagrant violation of the agreements that they knew were part of the carefully constructed release of this eagerly awaited book". A spokesman for Infinity Resources, who own DeepDiscount.com, said: "We take the situation very seriously and are conducting an internal investigation." JK Rowling has called on fans to dismiss speculation Levy Entertainment declined to comment. Scholastic has also asked "everyone, especially in the media, to preserve the fun and excitement for fans everywhere". Harry Potter author JK Rowling has also posted an appeal on her official website, stating: "Let's all, please, ignore the misinformation popping up on the web and in the press. "I'd like to ask everyone who calls themselves a Harry Potter fan to help preserve the secrecy of the plot for all those who are looking forward to reading the book at the same time on publication day. "In a very short time you will know everything!" the statement concluded. 'No magic wand' On Wednesday the Baltimore Sun printed a review of the book, saying it had obtained a copy from a relative of one of its reporters who had received it prematurely. It says Rowling's seventh book "lacks much of the charm and humour that distinguished the earlier novels" but makes up for it with "hard-won wisdom". Some fans are already queuing outside a central London bookshop On the same day, another copy was being offered for sale on internet auction site eBay by a seller who claimed to have received a copy ahead of the release date. "I don't work for a bookstore and I don't have a magic wand," the seller wrote. "An online store shipped a copy early." Earlier this week, pictures of what appeared to be pages from the new novel were circulating on the internet. Minna Fry, marketing director of the book's UK publisher Bloomsbury said: "There have been so many fake books going up on the internet over the past four to six weeks. We have no reason to believe that these are anything other than fake either." Scholastic issued a subpoena on Monday to California-based social networking site Gaia Online in connection to user-posted material on the book. In a statement, the website said the link had been immediately removed and that the user in question had been banned for 14 days. Scholastic also ordered photo-sharing service Photobucket to remove Potter-related material from its site.
Looks like you both missed out, you could have had the book early QuoteThe US publisher of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is taking legal action against two companies for dispatching copies of the book early. Scholastic sued online retailer DeepDiscount.com for breaking the strict embargo of 21 July. In court papers filed in Illinois, the publisher also named its distributor Levy Entertainment for failing to ensure books were not sent out. It said only a tiny fraction of its 12 million copies had been distributed. "The number of copies shipped is around one one-hundredth of one per cent," said Scholastic in a statement. 'Please ignore' The company added that they had a list of customers who had ordered the book from DeepDiscount.com and were asking them to put it to one side if they have already received it by mistake. A report in The Baltimore Sun newspaper about a customer who had already received his copy prompted Scholastic to take action. Scholastic is seeking unspecified damages from the two companies for "complete and flagrant violation of the agreements that they knew were part of the carefully constructed release of this eagerly awaited book". A spokesman for Infinity Resources, who own DeepDiscount.com, said: "We take the situation very seriously and are conducting an internal investigation." JK Rowling has called on fans to dismiss speculation Levy Entertainment declined to comment. Scholastic has also asked "everyone, especially in the media, to preserve the fun and excitement for fans everywhere". Harry Potter author JK Rowling has also posted an appeal on her official website, stating: "Let's all, please, ignore the misinformation popping up on the web and in the press. "I'd like to ask everyone who calls themselves a Harry Potter fan to help preserve the secrecy of the plot for all those who are looking forward to reading the book at the same time on publication day. "In a very short time you will know everything!" the statement concluded. 'No magic wand' On Wednesday the Baltimore Sun printed a review of the book, saying it had obtained a copy from a relative of one of its reporters who had received it prematurely. It says Rowling's seventh book "lacks much of the charm and humour that distinguished the earlier novels" but makes up for it with "hard-won wisdom". Some fans are already queuing outside a central London bookshop On the same day, another copy was being offered for sale on internet auction site eBay by a seller who claimed to have received a copy ahead of the release date. "I don't work for a bookstore and I don't have a magic wand," the seller wrote. "An online store shipped a copy early." Earlier this week, pictures of what appeared to be pages from the new novel were circulating on the internet. Minna Fry, marketing director of the book's UK publisher Bloomsbury said: "There have been so many fake books going up on the internet over the past four to six weeks. We have no reason to believe that these are anything other than fake either." Scholastic issued a subpoena on Monday to California-based social networking site Gaia Online in connection to user-posted material on the book. In a statement, the website said the link had been immediately removed and that the user in question had been banned for 14 days. Scholastic also ordered photo-sharing service Photobucket to remove Potter-related material from its site.
I'd have read it.
Duvet of invisibility?!?!?!? What are you reading? Harry Potter and the Deadly Incontinent Cat?
Just an observation but the release is at 2am on saturday. So this means you are probably going to have loads of excited kids (not to mention Geeky Potterette) in full fancy dress waiting in lines at the same time that a load of pubs and clubs are likely to be kicking out.........
Quote from: Bar Wench on July 19, 2007, 12:53:39 PMDuvet of invisibility?!?!?!? What are you reading? Harry Potter and the Deadly Incontinent Cat?Well seeing as they are CHILDREN'S BOOKS Wouldnt the title be more along the lines of Harry Potter and the Puddy Tat of Peril
Quote from: Grumpmeister on July 19, 2007, 04:29:17 PMQuote from: Bar Wench on July 19, 2007, 12:53:39 PMDuvet of invisibility?!?!?!? What are you reading? Harry Potter and the Deadly Incontinent Cat?Well seeing as they are CHILDREN'S BOOKS Wouldnt the title be more along the lines of Harry Potter and the Puddy Tat of Peril Errr ~ they publish two versions one for children and one for adults. I have ordered the Adult version.But hey! It's my life why shouldn't I read it? Huh?
Quote from: Snoopy on July 19, 2007, 04:40:17 PMQuote from: Grumpmeister on July 19, 2007, 04:29:17 PMQuote from: Bar Wench on July 19, 2007, 12:53:39 PMDuvet of invisibility?!?!?!? What are you reading? Harry Potter and the Deadly Incontinent Cat?Well seeing as they are CHILDREN'S BOOKS Wouldnt the title be more along the lines of Harry Potter and the Puddy Tat of Peril Errr ~ they publish two versions one for children and one for adults. I have ordered the Adult version.But hey! It's my life why shouldn't I read it? Huh?Sorry Snoopy I couldnt resist the joke
